Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22;2(1):100061. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100061

Table 1.

Use of ONP and SLT by Youth Demographics in the U.S., Findings From the ITC Youth Survey 2019–2021

ONP
SLT
Demographics Total Ever versus never Past 30-day user versus nonuser Ever versus never Past 30-day user versus nonuser
N=25,258 n=1,146 n=497 n=1,723 n=596
p<0.0001 p=0.0012 p<0.0001 p=0.0775
Age, years, n (%)
 16 5,491 (22.7) 175 (2.9) 77 (1.3) 281 (4.9) 124 (2.2)
 17 6,615 (26.6) 240 (2.9) 121 (1.4) 403 (5.6) 158 (2.1)
 18 7,581 (29.9) 373 (4.8) 150 (2.2) 553 (7.4) 164 (2.3)
 19 5,571 (20.8) 358 (5.7) 149 (2.3) 486 (9.0) 150 (3.0)
Sex, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 Male 7,379 (51.1) 456 (4.9) 213 (2.3) 806 (8.8) 344 (3.6)
 Female 17,879 (49.0) 690 (3.2) 284 (1.3) 917 (4.5) 252 (1.1)
Race/ethnicity, n (%) p=0.1526 p=0.7604 p=0.0016 p=0.4290
 Non-Hispanic White 13,125 (70.5) 599 (4.0) 271 (1.8) 1,044 (7.1) 361 (2.4)
 Non-Hispanic Black 3,538 (8.6) 181 (5.2) 76 (2.3) 200 (6.3) 66 (2.0)
 Hispanic 2,725 (6.2) 130 (4.4) 47 (1.9) 177 (6.5) 65 (2.7)
 Other/mixed 5,606 (14.0) 225 (3.7) 99 (1.8) 292 (5.0) 100 (1.9)
 Do not know/refused 264 (0.6) 11 (3.6) 4 (1.6) 10 (3.6) 4 (2.0)
Perceived family SES, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 Not meeting basic expenses 1,327 (4.5) 103 (7.2) 46 (3.6) 156 (11.8) 54 (4.7)
 Just meeting basic expenses 6,559 (22.8) 323 (4.4) 131 (1.9) 493 (7.6) 158 (2.6)
 Meeting needs with a little leftover 7,770 (31.9) 299 (3.6) 126 (1.4) 507 (6.5) 161 (2.0)
 Living comfortably 8,234 (35.9) 389 (4.2) 183 (2.1) 522 (6.1) 209 (2.4)
 Don't know/refused 1,368 (4.8) 32 (1.9) 11 (0.4) 45 (2.5) 14 (0.6)
Ever tried ONPs, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 24,112 (95.9) 1,136 (4.7) 295 (1.2)
 Yes 1,146 (4.1) 587 (53.8) 301 (28.4)
Past 30-day ONP user, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 24,761 (98.2) 1,430 (5.8) 375 (1.6)
 Yes 497 (1.8) 293 (56.3) 221 (44.4)
Ever tried SLT, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 23,535 (93.3) 559 (2.0) 204 (0.8)
 Yes 1,723 (6.7) 587 (32.8) 293 (15.2)
Past 30-day SLT user, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 24,662 (97.7) 845 (3.0) 276 (1.0)
 Yes 596 (2.3) 301 (49.3) 221 (34.1)
Ever tried cigarettes, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 17,563 (72.5) 409 (2.2) 143 (0.8) 442 (2.6) 140 (0.9)
 Yes 7,695 (27.5) 737 (9.1) 354 (4.4) 1,281 (17.5) 456 (6.2)
Past 30-day smoker, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 22,746 (94.4) 734 (3.3) 279 (1.3) 1,078 (5.4) 306 (1.7)
 Yes 2,512 (5.6) 412 (18.0) 218 (9.9) 645 (28.9) 290 (13.7)
Ever tried NVPs, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 14,759 (61.6) 290 (1.6) 101 (0.6) 399 (2.5) 119 (0.7)
 Yes 10,499 (38.4) 856 (8.0) 396 (3.7) 1,324 (13.4) 477 (4.9)
Past 30-day NVP user, n (%) p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001
 No 20,878 (84.7) 591 (2.4) 214 (0.9) 925 (4.4) 278 (1.4)
 Yes 4,380 (15.3) 555 (13.1) 283 (6.7) 798 (19.4) 318 (7.8)

Note: Unweighted sample sizes and weighted frequencies are presented. All p-values were calculated using a weighted Pearson's chi-square test.  Boldface p-values indicate statistical significance at p<0.05

ITC, International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project; NVP, nicotine vaping product; ONP, oral nicotine product; SLT, smokeless tobacco.