Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Dec 17;104(5):776–789. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.10.004

TABLE 2.

GRADE Evidence Profile of Mind-Body Exercise Interventions for the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Quality Assessment Participants n
Measure Comparator Follow-Up (# of studies) Study Limitations Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Reporting Bias Mind-Body Ctrl SMD* (95%CI) Quality of Evidence
Mind-Body Exercise Interventions for Pain
Pain – ST NEC (n=4) Not serious Seriousb Seriousc Not Serious Seriouse 178 170 −1.56f (−2.69; −0.42) Low
Pain – ST EC (n=4) Seriousa Not Serious Not serious Seriousd Seriouse 109 101 −0.26 (−0.46; −0.07) Very Low
Pain – LT (n=4) Seriousa Seriousb Seriousc Seriousd Seriouse 151 145 −0.60 (−1.43; −0.23) Very Low
Mind-Body Exercise Interventions for Disability
Disability – ST NEC (n=3) Not serious Seriousb Seriousc Not Serious Seriouse 128 123 −1.15f (−2.49; 0.18) Low
Disability – ST EC (n=3) Seriousa Not Serious Not serious Seriousd Seriouse 95 91 −0.27 (−0.59; 0.05) Very Low
Disability – LT (n=4) Seriousa Seriousb Seriousc Seriousd Seriouse 151 145 −1.05f (−3.51; 1.41) Very Low

SMD = Standardized mean difference; CI = Confidence interval *random effects model, negative values favor mind-body exercise interventions; ST = Short term; LT= Long term; NEC= Non-Exercise Control; EC = Exercise Control

Footnotes: Randomized trials begin with “High” quality of evidence.

a

Downgraded 1 level due to studies with small sample sizes (n<25).

b

Downgraded 1 level due to lack of similarity between point estimates

c

Downgraded 1 level due to indirectness in patient population, studies included samples of only females > 45 yo.

d

Downgraded 1 level due to large and varying confidence intervals.

e

Downgraded 1 level due to selective outcome reporting.

f

Increased 1 level due to large effects (SMD < −0.80).