Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in the United States, contributing to poor quality of life and disability.1 Sedentary lifestyle, a reversible CVD risk factor, has been found to be associated with increase CVD morbidity and mortality. Regular physical activity increases the ability of the circulatory and respiratory systems to supply oxygen to skeletal muscle mitochondria for energy production (ie, cardiorespiratory fitness). A 1989 study2 found that individuals with higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness had lower death rates, independently of their age, smoking status, blood pressure, lipids, diabetes, and personal and parental history of CVD. Therefore, interventions to help people be active, avoid nicotine exposure, eat a heart-healthy diet, get appropriate sleep, and control glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol may improve and maintain their cardiovascular health.
Disparities in cardiovascular fitness may lead to greater challenges in the efforts to prevent and control CVD. In the US, Black individuals are more likely to die from heart disease than non-Hispanic White individuals, and disparities have also been reported in the prevalence and control of CVD risk factors.3,4 Enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness during early adulthood and keeping it through midlife may lead to better clinical outcomes and serve as a primary strategy to reduce disparities. In the early 2000s, the Dallas Heart Study,5 a longitudinal multicenter population-based study, examined the factors associated with racial and ethnic differences in cardiorespiratory fitness. The Dallas Heart Study5 found that cardiorespiratory fitness among Black individuals was significantly lower than their non-Hispanic White counterparts after adjusting for age and sex. Similarly, this study by Pettee Gabriel and colleagues6 provides an analysis of trends for all-cause mortality and fatal and nonfatal CVD rates across different levels of cardiorespiratory fitness using data from the ongoing Coronary Artery Risk and Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Pettee Gabriel et al6 examined the association of early adult fitness and the percentage of early adult fitness retained in midlife with subsequent risk of all-cause mortality and CVD events, overall and stratified by sex and race groups. In contrast to the 1989 observational study by Blair et al2 the CARDIA study6 included younger participants (mean age 24.3 years). Since evidence on the importance of fitness has largely been established with older populations, this study provides additional insights in earlier adulthood.
Pettee Gabriel and colleagues6 report that better cardiorespiratory fitness at baseline, measured using 1-minute increments in a maximal graded exercise test, was significantly associated with an 18% lower risk of premature death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76–0.88]; men: HR,0.87 [95% CI, 0.80–0.96]; women: HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64–0.82]), as well as an 11% lower risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82–0.96]; men: HR, 0.90 [95% CI,0.82–0.98]; women: HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75–0.99]). In addition, retention of cardiorespiratory fitness through midlife (measured in 5% increments in the level of fitness after 20 years of follow-up) was significantly associated with a 11% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.89 [95% CI,0.79–0.99]) but not significantly associated with a reduction in fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78–1.00]).6 These results support previous studies showing an inverse association of fitness with all-cause mortality and CVD events,2,7 but the evidence in the CARDIA study6 adds the value of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in early adulthood.
It is also relevant to evaluate the impact that fitness training across the lifespan may have on modifiable risk factors, relevant clinical outcomes, and the reduction or elimination of race and sex disparities in high-risk populations. Specifically, the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness in women requires particular attention. Even though the CARDIA study found that most Black women did not meet physical activity guidelines (63% at baseline and 71% after 20 years of follow-up), those who had better cardiorespiratory fitness at baseline had a 25% lower overall mortality risk. Several clinical studies have examined the value of physical activity in premenopausal and postmenopausal women,8 but additional trials are needed to assess the value of individualized interventions to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in women with the appropriate length, frequency, type, and time-volume of exercise.
It is well known that physical activity leads to improved cardiorespiratory fitness through improved endothelial function, improved insulin sensitivity, increased capillary density, higher lactate threshold, reduced resting heart rate and blood pressure, improved lipid profiles, and reductions in visceral adiposity.9 The results from the study by Pettee Gabriel et al6 may offer a perspective for studies targeting cardiorespiratory fitness, CVD, and overall mortality. The CARDIA study6 provides evidence that when an individual starts efforts at cardiorespiratory fitness matters and that maintaining higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness may have a protective association against and reduce risk of CVD.6,10 In addition, improved cardiorespiratory fitness may be one of the key attributes explaining what Ortega et al3 called the “fat but fit paradox” in their 2018 study reporting that all-cause and CVD mortality risk were not different between individuals with obesity and those with normal weight if they were both in the top 20% for cardiorespiratory fitness based on age and gender.3 Further studies could focus on understanding the current disparity gaps in cardiovascular fitness and provide insights to develop and implement strategies for prevention and control of CVD among Black women and racial and ethnic groups with higher prevalence of physical inactivity, such as American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic adults.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
REFERENCES
- 1.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blair SN, Kohl HW III, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262(17):2395–2401. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430170057028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Labayen I, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. The fat but fit paradox: what we know and don’t know about it. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):151–153. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.He J, Zhu Z, Bundy JD, Dorans KS, Chen J, Hamm LL. Trends in cardiovascular risk factors in US adults by race and ethnicity and socioeconomic status, 1999–2018. JAMA. 2021;326(13):1286–1298. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pandey A, Park BD, Ayers C, et al. Determinants of racial/ethnic differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (from the Dallas Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2016;118(4):499–503. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pettee Gabriel K, Jaeger BC, Lewis CE, et al. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness in early adulthood and midlife with all-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2): e230842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goff DC Jr, Khan SS, Lloyd-Jones D, et al. Bending the curve in cardiovascular disease mortality: Bethesda + 40 and beyond. Circulation. 2021;143(8):837–851. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ruiz-Rios M, Maldonado-Martin S. Physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Menopause. 2022;29(10):1222–1229. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dishman RK, Heath G, Schmidt MD, Lee IM. Physical Activity Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Human Kinetics; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shah RV, Murthy VL, Colangelo LA, et al. Association of fitness in young adulthood with survival and cardiovascular risk: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):87–95. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]