Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 28;28(4):445–453. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0056

Table 2.

Comparison of three-dimensional (3DCT) and four-dimensional (4DCT) computed tomography simulation results of vital organ at risk (OAR) doses

Organs 3DCT 4DCT p
PTV [cm3] 460 ± 179 401±167 0.0018
Mean lung dose [Gy] 18.3 ± 4.00 16.9 ± 3.30 0.020
V5% [Gy] 59.9 ±12.30 44.6 ± 10.20 0.049
V10% [Gy] 55.8 ±11.70 31.2 ± 6.90 0.008
V20% [Gy] 40.5 ±8.60 28.9 ± 6.90 0.027
V30% [Gy] 28.9 ±6.90 25.3 ± 7.20 0.129
Mean heart dose [Gy] 15.8 ± 16.80 13.1 ±12.20 0.473
Maximum spinal cord dose [Gy] 40.0 ± 6.30 37.9 ± 6.10 0.116
Mean esophagus dose [Gy] 19.1 ± 7.50 18.7 ± 8.02 0.680
NTCP to the lungs (%) 31.75 ± 9.15 26.96 ± 7.40 1.54e-05
NTCP of the heart (%) 11.18 ± 10.02 7.78 ± 6.73 0.0018
NTCP of the esophagus 21.17 ± 10.09 19.45 ± 10.91 0.060
CI 0.62 ± 0.122 0.62 ± 0.164 0.827
DHI 1.09 ± 1.11 1.10 ± 0.03 0.579

PTV — planning target volume; NTCP — normal tissue complication probability; CI — conformity index; DHI — dose heterogeneity index