Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 30;13(10):4105–4126. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.11.026

Table 3.

The comparison of lipid carriers for mRNA delivery.

Carrier type Characteristic Advantage Disadvantage
LPs Spherical vesicles with a lipid bilayer. Low toxicity, high biocompatibility, protection of envelope. Low EE.
LPPs Spherical vesicles with a cationic lipid bilayer. Higher EE. Significant toxicity.
LLPs Sphere-shaped, multi/monolayer nanosized vesicle. Less toxic, higher EE, improved endosome escape. Instability under non-freezing conditions.
SLNs Spherical vesicles with a core consisting of a solid matrix. Higher physical stability, more robust mRNA protection, and higher delivery efficacy. Expulsion of the incorporated mRNA.
NLCs Spherical vesicles with a core consisting of both solid and liquid lipids. Higher physicochemical stability, higher drug-loading capacity, less drug leakage, and controlled drug release. In the preparation (high-pressure homogenization) process, the high temperature may promote the degradation of drug and the carriers.
LPNs Core-shell nanoparticle structure composed of polymer core and lipid shell. Less biofouling, prolonged half-life, sustained drug release. Polymeric materials may bring unwanted side effects.
Nanoemulsions A heterogeneous colloidal dispersion of nanodroplets dispersed in another liquid phase. Prolonged half-life, less irritation. Emulsifier incorporation may generate safety risks.
Exosomes Nanosized lipid vesicles secreted from living cells, ranging from 30 to 150 nm. Extremely high biocompatibility and stability, biological barrier permeability, and extended circulation time. Modification is required to obtain high target site affinity. The preparation of exosomes is time-consuming with high costs.
LPTs Heterogeneous NPs present in biological fluids, mainly composed of lipids and proteins. Extremely high biocompatibility, non-immunogenicity and stability, intrinsic targeting ability. The purification of LPTs is time-consuming and poorly scalable.

These lipid carriers have lower toxicity and higher inclusion protection than non-lipid vectors. The advantages and disadvantages of the carriers were demonstrated by comparing with LPs.

EE, encapsulation efficiency; LPs, liposomes; LPNs, lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles; LLPs, liposome-like nanoparticles; LPPs, lipoplexes; LPTs, lipidprotein-particles; NLCs, nanostructured lipid carriers; SLNs, solid lipid nanoparticles.