Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 25;38(5):645–653. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006234

Table 2.

Comparing Three Approaches to Paramedic Prehospital Tele-Ultrasound

Category Pros Cons
A paramedic attaches a special tele-echography robot that is remotely controlled by a physician who conducts the exam • Frees paramedic to provide additional medical care while physician performs scan
• Portable robotic system for tele-ultrasound, compatible with body motions
• Difficult to replicate in resource-limited settings
• Complexity and cost of equipment
• Time-consuming
• Not as practical for patients with larger body sizes
• No data on usefulness of method for female patients
• Remote robot operator not always available immediately
A paramedic performs the scan and is “tele-mentored” in real-time by an ultrasound expert in another location • Less training required
• Lower cost, uses increasingly more accessible technology (laptop, camera, internet)
• Potentially more useful in rural and resource-limited settings
• Time-intensive, relatively unsafe
• Remote image receiver and mentor not always available immediately
• Requires strong verbal communication between medic and remote expert
A paramedic performs the scan which is transmitted in real-time to a receiving ultrasound expert for immediate interpretation • Safest option, might take less time
• Less technological equipment required, more space available in the ambulance
• Moderate training required
• Remote image receiver and interpreter not always available immediately