Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 3;12(3):277–289. doi: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277

Table 2. LDL cholesterol levels at baseline and after treatment with rosuvastatin monotherapy or rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy.

Variables R20 (n=132) RE10/10 (n=126) Mean difference (standard error) 95% confidence interval p-value
LDL-C at baseline (mg/dL), median [Min, Max] 78.5, [34, 192] 79.5, [32, 209] 0.425*
At 12 wk
LDL -C at 12 wk (mg/dL) 66.7 (20.5) 60.5 (24.1)
Absolute changes (mg/dL) −14.3 (22.9) −22.9 (38.1)
Diabetes status 0.086
% change(%) −15.6 (2.5) −22.9 (2.6) −7.4 (3.6) −14.4 to −0.3 0.041§
At 24 wk
LDL-C at 24 wk (mg/dL) 68.6 (22.19) 60.9 (25.8)
Absolute changes (mg/dL) −11.4 (28.6) −23.8 (31.4)
Diabetes status 0.016
% change (%) −12.9 (2.4) −24.2 (2.5) −11.3 (3.5) −18.1 to −4.5 0.001§

R20, high intensity statin group which received 20 mg of rosuvastatin once daily; RE10/10, combination therapy group which received 10 mg rosuvastatin and 10 mg ezetimibe once daily; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

*Difference between control and treatment groups (Wilcoxon rank sum test); Difference between diabetic and nondiabetic patients using the ANCOVA model including baseline LDL-C as a covariate; Percent change from baseline at week 12(%) = {(LDL-C after 12 weeks)−(LDL-C at baseline)}/(LDL-C at baseline)×100; §Difference between control and treatment groups using the ANCOVA model including baseline LDL-C and diabetic status as covariates; Percent change from baseline at week 24(%) = {(LDL-C after 24 weeks)−(LDL-C at baseline)}/(LDL-C at baseline)×100.