Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;24:374. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05479-7

Table 5.

The comparison between the performance of DrugRep-HeSiaGraph and DrugRep-KG based on four versions of DDKGs

Model DDKG version ACC (%) AUC-ROC (%) AUC-PR (%) BS (%) MCC (%) F1-score (%)
DrugRep-HeSiaGraph DDKG-V1 84.63±0.02 91.16±0.04 90.32±0.13 11.90±0.04 69.31±0.82 83.13±0.12
DDKG-V2 83.44±0.10 90.63±0.07 90.09±0.19 12.01±0.05 67.53±0.13 80.54±0.27
DDKG-V3 84.51±0.04 90.97±0.03 90.27±0.41 12.00±0.04 69.12±0.14 82.84±0.08
DDKG-V4 83.91±0.08 91.15±0.10 90.17±0.27 12.06±0.03 67.90±0.35 82.08±0.19
DrugRep-KG DDKG-V1 83.9 3 91.00 90.30 11.97 67.90 82.83
DDKG-V2 83.92 90.57 89.94 12.18 67.50 83.04
DDKG-V3 82.45 91.03 90.18 12.15 64.99 82.73
DDKG-V4 82.45 90.94 89.97 12.24 64.92 81.89
DisDrugPred 58.73 53.45 38.91
DRP-VEM 52.33 55.37 55.12 29.76 32.43 52.35