Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;16:343. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05942-7

Table 3.

Estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic methods used in this study to detect Plasmodium spp. using microscopy as reference

RDT Field-cLAMP Lab-cLAMP Lab-qLAMP
Sensitivity (95% CI) 92.5% (86.2%, 98.8%) 98.5% (95.6%, 101.4%) 89.6% (82.2%, 96.9%) 86.6% (78.4%, 94.7%)
Specificity (95% CI) 72.9% (65.4%, 80.5%) 65.4% (57.3%, 73.5%) 76.7% (69.5%, 83.9%) 78.9% (72.0%, 85.9%)
PPV (95% CI) 63.3% (53.7%, 72.8%) 58.9% (49.8%, 68.0%) 65.9% (56.2%, 75.7%) 67.4% (57.5%, 77.3%)
NPV (95% CI) 95.1% (90.9%, 99.3%) 98.9% (96.6%, 101.1%) 93.6% (89.0%, 98.2%) 92.1% (87.2%, 97.1%)

RDT, Rapid Diagnostic Tests; Field-cLAMP, colorimetric field LAMP assay; Lab-cLAMP, colorimetric laboratory LAMP assay; Lab-qLAMP, laboratory real-time LAMP assay; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence intervals