Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 4;131(10):107002. doi: 10.1289/EHP11646

Table 2.

The observational association of long-term exposure to PM2.5 with BMD measured after the year 2010 in males (n=18,591 for heel BMD; n=14,798 for lumbar spine 1 to 4 BMD; n=14,798 for femur neck BMD) and females (n=18,849 for heel BMD; n=14,968 for lumbar spine 1 to 4 BMD; n=14,968 for femur neck BMD) in the UK Biobank.

β-coefficient a SE p-Valueb
Heel BMD
 Male
  Model 1 0.004 0.001 1.68×105
  Model 2 0.003 0.001 0.001
 Female
  Model 1 0.002 0.001 0.001
  Model 2 0.002 0.001 0.036
Lumbar spine 1 to 4 BMD
 Male
  Model 1 0.007 0.001 1.54×106
  Model 2 0.006 0.002 2.19×104
 Female
  Model 1 0.004 0.001 0.004
  Model 2 0.003 0.001 0.027
Femur neck BMD (right)
 Male
  Model 1 0.004 0.001 6.84×105
  Model 2 0.003 0.001 0.004
 Female
  Model 1 0.002 0.001 0.055
  Model 2 0.002 0.001 0.113

Note: Model 1 was adjusted for confounders, including age, body mass index, and ancestry; model 2=model 1+education+smoking+alcohol+physical activity+circulating calcium+calcium supplementary status. BMD, bone mineral density; PM2.5, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5μm; SE, standard error.

a

The β-coefficient represents the change in BMD in grams per centimeter squared for a 1-μg/m3 increase in annual PM2.5 concentrations.

b

All p-values were derived from multiple linear regression.