Abstract
Ensuring effective distribution of guidelines is an important step towards their implementation. To examine the effectiveness of dissemination of a guidelines card on management of head injury and determine its usefulness to senior house officers (SHOs), a questionnaire survey was performed in May 1990, after distribution of the cards in induction packs for new doctors and at postgraduate lectures and displaying the guidelines in accident and emergency departments and wards. A further survey, in March 1992, assessed the impact of modifying the distribution. All (175) SHOs working in general surgery, accident and emergency medicine, orthopaedics, and neurosciences on 1 February 1990 in 19 hospitals including two neurosurgical units in Northern region were sent self completion questionnaires about awareness, receipt, use, and perceived usefulness of the guidelines. 131 of 163(80%) SHOs in post responded (median response from hospitals 83% (range 50%-100%)). Over three quarters (103, 79%) of SHOs were aware of the guidelines and 82(63%) had ever possessed a guidelines card. Only 36(44%) acquired the card in the induction pack. 92%(98/107) found them useful and 81% (89/110) referred to them to some extent. Owning and carrying the card and referring to guidelines were associated with departmental encouragement to use the guidelines. Increasing the displays of guidelines in wards and departments and the supply of cards to consultants in accident and emergency medicine as a result of this survey did not increase the number of SHOs who received cards (52/83, 63%), but more (71/83, 86%) were aware of the guidelines. The guidelines were welcomed by SHOs and used in treating patients with head injury, but their distribution requires improvement. Increased use of the guidelines may be achieved by introducing other distribution methods and as a result of encouragement by senior staff.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Audet A. M., Greenfield S., Field M. Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):709–714. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gleicher N. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980. JAMA. 1984 Dec 21;252(23):3273–3276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grilli R., Apolone G., Marsoni S., Nicolucci A., Zola P., Liberati A. The impact of patient management guidelines on the care of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer patients in Italy. Med Care. 1991 Jan;29(1):50–63. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199101000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins D. Investigations: how to get from guidelines to protocols. BMJ. 1991 Aug 10;303(6798):323–324. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6798.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leape L. L. Practice guidelines and standards: an overview. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990 Feb;16(2):42–49. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lomas J., Anderson G. M., Domnick-Pierre K., Vayda E., Enkin M. W., Hannah W. J. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madhok R., Green S., Thomson R. G., Mordue A. Not research and development. BMJ. 1991 Oct 5;303(6806):854–854. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry S. The NIH Consensus Development Program. A decade later. N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 20;317(8):485–488. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198708203170806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiono P. H., Fielden J. G., McNellis D., Rhoads G. G., Pearse W. H. Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States. JAMA. 1987 Jan 23;257(4):494–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]