Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;153(9):2642–2650. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.05.009

TABLE 2.

Adjusted mean BMD at hip and spine sites across dietary Ca:Mg tertiles among Puerto Rican adults (n = 888)1

BMD at spine and hip sites Calcium-to-magnesium intake ratio (Ca:Mg)
Tertile 1 (n = 296)
Tertile 2 (n = 296)
Tertile 3 (n = 296)
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Lumbar spine (L2–L4) BMD (g/cm2)
 Model 1 1.180 ± 0.015 1.204 ± 0.015 1.172 ± 0.015
 Model 2 1.180 ± 0.015 1.210 ± 0.015 1.172 ± 0.015
 Model 3 1.190 ± 0.016 1.211 ± 0.0151 1.170 ± 0.0162
 Model 4 1.170 ± 0.018 1.204 ± 0.015 1.180 ± 0.018
Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2)
 Model 1 0.940 ± 0.011 0.971 ± 0.0112 0.938 ± 0.0111
 Model 2 0.940 ± 0.011 0.972 ± 0.0112 0.939 ± 0.011
 Model 3 0.943 ± 0.0121 0.972 ± 0.0112 0.936 ± 0.0121
 Model 4 0.936 ± 0.0131 0.971 ± 0.0112 0.943 ± 0.013
Trochanter BMD (g/cm2)
 Model 1 0.830 ± 0.011 0.858 ± 0.0112 0.833 ± 0.0111
 Model 2 0.830 ± 0.011 0.859 ± 0.0112 0.833 ± 0.0111
 Model 3 0.836 ± 0.011 0.86 ± 0.0112 0.827 ± 0.0111
 Model 4 0.825 ± 0.0131 0.858 ± 0.0112 0.838 ± 0.013
Total hip BMD (g/cm2)
 Model 1 1.025 ± 0.0111 1.062 ± 0.0122 1.025 ± 0.0121
 Model 2 1.026 ± 0.0111 1.063 ± 0.0122 1.031 ± 0.0121
 Model 3 1.032 ± 0.0131 1.063 ± 0.0122 1.020 ± 0.0131
 Model 4 1.017 ± 0.0141 1.061 ± 0.0122 1.033 ± 0.014
1

Means with different superscript numbers are significantly different. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex/estrogen status, height, BMI, smoking status, serum vitamin D concentration, alcohol intake, use of calcium supplements, and use of magnesium supplements. Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 plus dietary magnesium. Model 3 was adjusted for model 1 plus dietary calcium. Model 4 was adjusted for model 1 plus dietary calcium and dietary magnesium.