Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 21;36(4):425–440. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23161

Table 1.

Quality assessment of the included articles

Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Item 8 Item 9 Item 10 Overall
Dias 2016 Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
Gwak 2016 Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
Hama 2012 Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes Low
Hosseini 2014 Yes Yes No Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
Hosseini 2020 Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
Hwang 1997 Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
Jeon 2006 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low
Jiang 2014 Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
LaGraize 2007 Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Low
Lee 2010 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Low
Lee 2015 Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes Low
Moon 2016 Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Low
Moon 2017 Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Low
Nasirinezhad 2019 Unclear Yes Yes Yes Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Low
Pedersen 2007 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Low
Rashid 2002 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low
Rode 2005 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Low
Sadeghi 2021 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low
Seno 2018 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low
Wei 2009 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low
Yowtak 2013 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low
Zarrindast 2001 Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Yes Low

1. Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied?

2. Were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis?

3. Was the allocation adequately concealed?

4. Were the animals randomly housed during the experiment?

5. Were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge which intervention each animal received during the experiment?

6. Were animals selected at random for outcome assessment?

7. Was the outcome assessor blinded?

8. Were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed?

9. Are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting?

10. Was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias?