Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 6;130(9):1487–1499. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523000545

Table 1.

Recent clinical trials (2017–to date) exploring the effects of IF regimens on outcomes of bone health

Study Study population Duration Intervention description Weight changes Main bone findings
ADF (n 3)
Barnosky et al., 2017(60) Overweight/obese adults aged 18–65 years, 3 groups (ADF, CER, control)
ADF: n 21, mean ± sem age: 44 ± 2 years, BMI: 34 ± 1 kg/m2, 19 W/2 M
CER: n 24, age: 44 ± 2 years, BMI: 34 ± 1 kg/m2, 20 W/4 M
Control: n 17, age: 40 ± 3 years, BMI: 32 ± 1 kg/m2, 15W/2M
6 months ADF: 25 % DEI fast day, alternated with 125 % DEI feast day –7·8 ± 1·2 % Total body BMC and BMD remained unchanged in all groups. OC, BAP and CTX did not change in any group. No differences between premenopausal or postmenopausal women for any marker
CER: 75 % DEI every day –8·8 ± 1·5 %
Control: habitual intake NS
Stekovic et al., 2019(57) Non-obese adults aged 35–65 years, 2 groups (ADF, control) ADF: n 29, median age (IQR): 48 (43–55) years, mean BMI (±sd): 25·5 ± 1·8 kg/m2, 17 W/12 M Control: n 28, age 51 (45–57) years, BMI: 25·4 ± 2·2 kg/m2, 17 W/11 M 4 weeks ADF: ad libitum eating every second-day, no kcal on the fast days –3·5 ± 1·5 kg BMD at the lumbar spine region (derived from total body scans) ↓ after ADF but not after control. Comparing Comparison of ΔBMDs of both groups did not yield significant differences. No within or between group differences were seen for total body BMC
Control: habitual diet NS:–0·2 ± 1·1 kg
Templeman et al., 2021(30) Lean healthy adults aged 18–65 years, 3 groups (CER 75:75, ADF 0:150, ADF 0:200) CER 75:75: n 12, mean ± sd age: 45 ± 6 years, BMI: 24·0 ± 1·9 kg/m2, 7W/5M ADF 0:150: n 12, age: 42 ± 11 years, BMI: 23·9 ± 2·4 kg/m2, 5W/7M ADF 0:200: n 12, age: 41 ± 14 years, BMI: 23·6 ± 2·1 kg/m2, 9 W/3 M 3 weeks CER: 75 % DEI (75:75) –1·9 ± 1·0 kg No differences in plasma CTX pre- and post-intervention. No group differences in BMC or BMD
ADF with ER: 24-h fasting with 150 % DEI on alternate days (0:150) –1·6 ± 1·1 kg
ADF without ER: 24-h fasting 200 % DEI on alternate days (0:200) NS: −0·5 ± 1·1 kg
TRE (n 5)
Martens et al., 2019(63 Apparently healthy, non-obese adults, 2 crossed-over interventions (TRE, control)
n 22, mean ± sem age: 67 ± 1 years, BMI: 24·7 ± 0·6 kg/m2, 12 W/10 M
6 weeks TRF: ad libitum 8-h eating window NS Total and regional BMD were not different between conditions
Control: habitual diet NS
Lowe et al., 2020(61) Overweight and obese adults (in-person cohort), two groups (TRE, consistent meal timing (CMT)) TRE: n 25, mean ± sd age: 43 ± 12 years, BMI: 31·5 ± 4·5 kg/m2, 12 W/13 M CMT: n 25, age:44 ± 11 years, BMI: 31·3 ± 3·5 kg/m2, 10 W/15 M 12 weeks TRE: ad libitum 8-h eating window between 12.00 and 20.00 hours –1·7 kg A trend towards a ↑ in BMC in the TRE group (P = 0·09) but not in the CMT group. BMC changes did not differ between groups
CMT: Habitual diet consumed in 3
structured meals per day
NS: 0·6 kg
Lobene et al., 2021(62) Overweight and obese adults, two groups (TRE, non-TRE) TRE: n 11, mean ± sem age: 47 ± 4 years, BMI: 33·8 ± 2·3 kg/m2, 9 W/2 M non-TRE: n 9, age: 44 ± 4 years, BMI:34·4 ± 2·6 kg/m2, 8 W/1 M 12 weeks TRE: ad libitum 8-h eating window –3·7 ± 0·5 % P1NP ↓ in both groups (time effect) with a trend towards a greater ↓ in the non-TRE group (time × group interaction, P = 0·07). Total body BMC ↑ in the TRE group and ↓ in the non-TRE group (time × group interaction, P = 0·02)
Non-TRE: habitual diet NS
Kotarsky et al., 2021(67) Overweight/obese adults, two groups (TRE + ex, non-TRE + ex) TRE + ex: n 11, age: 45 ± 3 years, BMI: 29·8 ± 0·8 kg/m2, 9 W/2 M non-TRE + ex: n 10, age: 44 ± 2 years, BMI: 29·4 ± 0·8 kg/m2, 9 W/1 M 8 weeks TRE + ex : ad libitum 8-h eating window between 12.00 and 20.00 hours + exercise (aerobic + resistance) 3·3 % No significant time, group or time × group interaction for total body BMC or BMD
Non-TRE + ex: habitual diet + exercise (aerobic + resistance) NS: 0·2 %
Papageorgiou et al., 2022(64) Individuals with at least one component of the metabolic syndrome, two groups (TRE, SDA)
TRE: n 23, median (IQR) age: 47 (32, 57) years, BMI: 27·9 (25·5, 31·4) kg/m2, 18 W/5 M
SDA: n 19, age: 45 (27, 50) years, BMI: 26·7 (23·8, 30·6) kg/m2, 14 W/5 M
6 months TRE: ad libitum 12-h eating window –0·6 kg (median)
Total cohort: no between-group differences (TRE v. SDA) in CTX, P1NP or total body BMC/BMD responses. Analysis by weight loss response: among weight loss responders, CTX tended to ↓ after TRE but ↑ after SDA (between-group differences P = 0·041), P1NP changes did not differ between groups. Total body BMC ↓ after SDA, but remained unchanged after TRE (between-group differences in weight loss responders P = 0·028). Among non-responders (< 0·6 kg weight loss), there were no between-group differences in bone outcomes
SDA: 10-min counselling for healthy eating + healthy eating brochure NS

↓, indicates a decrease; ↑, indicates an increase; ADF, alternate-day fasting; BAP, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; CER, continuous energy expenditure; CMT, consistent meal timing; CTX, β-carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen; Δ, delta; DEI, dietary energy intake; ex, exercise; M, men; NS, non-significant; OC, osteocalcin; P1NP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide; SDA, standard dietary advice; TRE, time-restricted eating; W, women; IQR, inter-quartile range; .

The primary outcomes of the included studies were changes in body weight (n 3; Barnosky et al. (60); Lowe et al. (61); Kotarsky et al. (67)), changes in body composition (n 1; Templeman et al. (30)), changes in insulin sensitivity (n 1; Stekovic et al. (57)), changes in components of energy balance and post-prandial metabolism (n 1; Templeman et al. (30)), change in the metabolic syndrome components (n 1; Papageorgiou et al. (64)) and changes in endothelium-dependent dilation (n 1; Martens et al. (63)).