Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 5;28:403. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01339-5

Table 2.

Comparisons of all of the radiographic parameters and HRQOL data before and after surgery

Variables Pre-operation Post-operation Final follow-up P
TK 16.33 ± 12.42 21.61 ± 9.77 28.78 ± 11.46  < 0.001
LL 23.18 ± 18.36 38.60 ± 12.47 40.21 ± 11.70  < 0.001
SS 23.47 ± 12.03 30.04 ± 10.48 28.86 ± 11.82  < 0.001
PT 23.31 ± 11.07 16.83 ± 9.20 19.32 ± 10.21  < 0.001
PI 46.91 ± 11.47 46.98 ± 11.72 47.07 ± 11.20 0.901
SAA 44.42 ± 8.20 38.45 ± 7.57 35.56 ± 8.27  < 0.001
PFA 198.58 ± 10.67 190.99 ± 9.79 194.12 ± 12.01  < 0.001
PI–LL 23.72 ± 18.12 8.38 ± 12.57 9.21 ± 13.72  < 0.001
SVA 44.73 ± 49.94 11.16 ± 33.13 22.63 ± 40.17  < 0.001
TPA 21.69 ± 11.92 14.39 ± 9.03 16.21 ± 10.39  < 0.001
ODI 47.80 ± 15.67 21.10 ± 13.20 30.76 ± 14.88  < 0.001
PCS 29.9 ± 8.27 42.80 ± 9.81 36.23 ± 8.88  < 0.001
MCS 50.10 ± 9.93 54.88 ± 10.02 48.21 ± 8.95  < 0.001

The values were given as the mean and the standard deviation.

TK indicates thoracic kyphosis, SS Sacral slope, PT Pelvic tilt, TPA T1 pelvic angle, SVA Sagittal vertical axis, PI–LL Mismatch pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, SAA Sagittal acetabular anteversion, PFA Pelvic femur angle, HRQOL Health-related questionnaires of life, ODI Oswestry disability index, PCS Physical component score of SF-36, MCS Mental component score of SF-36