Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 22;14:1237052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1237052

Table 2.

Frequency (%) of individual neurodivergencies in each group, and average number of neurodivergencies per group.

Neurodivergence Current SD Past SD No SD Lifelong EHE Between-group analysis
Neurodivergent (ND) 666 (92.1) 168 (83.6) 33 (22.2) 22 (88.0) χ2(3,1,098) = 394.5, p < 0.001
Autistic 598 (83.4) 133 (66.2) 25 (16.8) 13 (52.0) χ2(3,1,092) = 269.7, p < 0.001
Sensory Processing Disorder/Sensory Integration Disorder (SPD/SID) 406 (56.9) 87 (43.3) 10 (6.7) 13 (52.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 126.2, p < 0.001
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 395 (55.3) 87 (43.3) 13 (8.7) 12 (48.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 108.6, p < 0.001
Dyslexia 181 (25.4) 47 (23.4) 8 (5.4) 2 (8.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 31.9, p < 0.001
Dyspraxia 177 (24.7) 55 (27.4) 12 (8.1) 2 (8.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 108.6, p < 0.001
Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) 130 (18.2) 26 (12.9) 5 (3.4) 3 (12.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 22.4, p < 0.001
Speech Difficulties 115 (16.1) 21 (10.4) 7 (4.7) 4 (16.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 15.8, p < 0.01
Gifted 103 (14.4) 29 (14.4) 6 (4.0) 6 (24.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 14.7, p < 0.01
Other 89 (12.5) 16 (8.0) 3 (2.0) 3 (12.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 16.1, p < 0.01
Dyscalculia 88 (12.3) 19 (9.5) 4 (2.7) 0 χ2(3,1,089) = 15.7, p < 0.01
Language Disorder 82 (11.5) 20 (10.0) 4 (2.7) 2 (8.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 10.8, p < 0.05
Visual Processing Difficulties 69 (9.7) 19 (9.5) 0 0 χ2(3,1,089) = 18.2, p < 0.001
Tic Disorder 61 (8.5) 13 (6.5) 5 (3.4) 1 (4.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 5.6, p > 0.05
Unspecified Learning Disorder 60 (8.4) 10 (5.0) 1 (0.7) 1 (4.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 13.4, p < 0.01
Intellectual Disability 48 (6.7) 10 (5.0) 2 (1.3) 1 (4.0) χ2(3,1,089) = 7.1, p > 0.05
Spatial Processing Disorder 46 (6.4) 10 (5.0) 2 (1.3) 0 χ2(3,1,089) = 7.9, p < 0.05
Mean Number of NDs (StDev) 3.7 (2.5) 3 (2.5) 0.72 (1.7) 2.5 (2.0) F(3,1,085) = 61.0, p < 0.001

Frequencies reflect the number of parents who responded “yes” or “maybe” to their child being neurodivergent and having each neurodivergent condition. Under the “other” category, hypermobility, PDA, and dysgraphia were the most frequently mentioned. Chi-Square (χ2) analyzes were used to explore between-group differences for categorical variables, while the quantitative variable (i.e., number of ND conditions per CYP) was explored using a one-way ANOVA.