Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2023 Aug 18;454:114632. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114632

Table 2:

Social Reward fMRI Contrast Categories

Study Group Contrast Type of Task Task Contrast Reason for Exclusion
from ALE Analysis
Davey et al., 2011 MDD vs. HC; Young Adults Passive; Acceptance or rejection of high vs. low rated faces, ambiguous feedback control condition Positive Faces vs. Control Faces
All Faces vs. Fixation
Frey & McCabe, 2020a MDD; High Depression vs. Low Depression Performance; Social learning of association between names & valenced faces Social Reward
Social Aversion vs. Neutral Faces
Frey & McCabe, 2020b Serotonin vs. Dopamine Depletion vs. Placebo Performance; Social learning of association between names & valenced faces Social Reward Prediction Findings account for neurotransmitter depletion status.
Social Aversion Prediction
Social Reward vs. Social Aversion
Fearful Faces vs. Neutral Faces
Greening et al., 2013 MDD vs. HC Performance; Facial emotion recognition, displayed with valenced distractor cues Happy Face Target & Neutral Distractor
Fearful Face Target & Neutral Distractor
Neutral Target & Happy Distractor
Neutral Target & Fearful Distractor
He et al., 2019 Subclinical MDD vs. HC Performance; Monetary Incentive Delay Task with social evaluation manipulation Response: Happy vs. Control
Response: Sad vs. Control
Anticipation: Sad vs. Control
He et al., 2022 Subclinical MDD vs. HC Performance; Social judgement, likelihood of acceptance followed by acceptance or rejection “Yes” anticipation followed by Acceptance
“Yes” anticipation followed by Rejection
“No” anticipation followed by Acceptance
“No” anticipation followed by Rejection
Healey et al., 2014 MDD & Anxiety & HC; Late Adolescents Passive; Social judgement, acceptance or rejection of high vs. low rated faces, ambiguous feedback control condition Mutual Liking vs. Received Liking
Positive Feedback vs. Ambiguous Feedback
Keedwell et al., 2005 MDD vs. HC Happy Mood Condition
Passive; Mood induction via audio recording, mood-congruent facial display Sad Mood Condition
Happy vs. Sad Mood Condition
Kumar et al., 2015 MDD vs. HC Performance; Monetary Incentive Delay Task with social evaluation manipulation Response to Reward; Stress vs. No Stress Condition
Laurent & Albow, 2013 MDD vs. HC; Mothers Passive; Viewing valenced faces of own vs. other infant Distressed Faces; Own vs. Other Infant
Morgan et al., 2015 MDD; Mothers Passive; Viewing video recordings of own vs. other child, positive vs. negative recordings Positive Faces; Own Child vs. Stranger
Negative Faces; Own Child vs. Stranger
Morgan et al., 2019 MDD; High Risk vs. Low Risk; Children Passive; Viewing valenced faces of own vs. other mother Happy Faces; High Risk vs. Low Risk Findings account for depression risk status.
Murrough et al., 2015 MDD vs. HC Performance; Facial emotion recognition task All conditions
Nagy et al., 2021 MDD + Childhood Maltreatment; MDD; HC Performance; Facial recognition paradigm, match valenced test faces to central target face, shape matching control condition Face-matching vs. Shape-matching
Penton-Voak et al., 2020 Sub-Clinical MDD; Intervention vs. No Intervention Performance; Sex discrimination of valenced faces Happy Faces vs. Sad Faces Control: fixation / rest instead of neutral stimulus condition.
Happy Faces vs. Fearful + Sad Faces
Happy Faces vs. Rest
Perini et al., 2019 NSSI vs. HC; Adolescents Performance; Facial emotion recognition of self vs. other, acceptance & rejection in other condition Anticipation: Self vs. Other
Response: Self vs. Other
Quevedo et al., 2018 MDD vs. HC; Adolescents Performance; Emotional Self-Other Morph-Query (ESOM-Q) Task Self vs. Other
Schaefer et al., 2006 MDD vs. HC Passive; Social situation viewing, social interaction and facial stimuli, appetitive control condition Group * Scan Time * Stimulus Condition Findings account for scan time (pre- vs. post-tx).
Schwartz et al., 2019 MDD + Anxiety; Adolescents Performance; Probe response task with probe displayed with valenced or neutral faces Treatment Main Effect Findings account for effect of treatment (behavioral therapy).
Treatment Main Effect * Face Emotion * Probe Location
Seitz et al., 2023 Mixed Sample: MDD, PTSD, Somatic Sensory Disorder, HC Performance; Social Incentive Delay Task Social Reward Anticipation vs. Neutral Cue
Sharma et al., 2016 MDD vs. BPD vs. HC Performance; Sex discrimination followed by valenced facial feedback Happy Face vs. Angry Face
Happy Face vs. Angry Face * Group * Depression Severity
Silk et al., 2014 MDD vs. HC; Adolescents Performance; Chatroom task, social acceptance & rejection Acceptance > Rejection
Silk et al., 2017 MDD vs. HC; Adolescents Passive; Listening to audio clips of maternal praise or criticism Criticism vs. Neutral
Praise vs. Neutral
Whittle et al., 2012 MDD; Adolescents Passive; Viewing video clips of positive, aggressive, and neutral behavior, own vs. other mother Positive vs. Neutral Behavior
Aggressive vs. Neutral Behavior
Wonch et al., 2016 Postpartum Depression vs. HC Passive; Viewing valenced faces of own vs. other infant Familiar Face vs. Unfamiliar Face
Unfamiliar Face
Non-Infant Stimuli
All Conditions
Yttredahl et al., 2018 MDD vs. HC Passive; Viewed highly rated “dating profiles” in scanner, followed by acceptance or rejection Rejection vs. Neutral
Acceptance vs. Neutral

graphic file with name nihms-1928856-f0005.jpg

Note: ALE = Activation Likelihood Estimate; BPD = Bipolar Major Depressive Disorder; HC = Healthy Control; MDD = Major Depression Disorder; NSSI = non-suicidal self injury