Table 2:
Social Reward fMRI Contrast Categories
| Study | Group Contrast | Type of Task | Task Contrast | Reason for Exclusion from ALE Analysis | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davey et al., 2011 | MDD vs. HC; Young Adults | Passive; Acceptance or rejection of high vs. low rated faces, ambiguous feedback control condition | Positive Faces vs. Control Faces | |
| All Faces vs. Fixation | ||||
| Frey & McCabe, 2020a | MDD; High Depression vs. Low Depression | Performance; Social learning of association between names & valenced faces | Social Reward | |
| Social Aversion vs. Neutral Faces | ||||
| Frey & McCabe, 2020b | Serotonin vs. Dopamine Depletion vs. Placebo | Performance; Social learning of association between names & valenced faces | Social Reward Prediction | Findings account for neurotransmitter depletion status. | 
| Social Aversion Prediction | ||||
| Social Reward vs. Social Aversion | ||||
| Fearful Faces vs. Neutral Faces | ||||
| Greening et al., 2013 | MDD vs. HC | Performance; Facial emotion recognition, displayed with valenced distractor cues | Happy Face Target & Neutral Distractor | |
| Fearful Face Target & Neutral Distractor | ||||
| Neutral Target & Happy Distractor | ||||
| Neutral Target & Fearful Distractor | ||||
| He et al., 2019 | Subclinical MDD vs. HC | Performance; Monetary Incentive Delay Task with social evaluation manipulation | Response: Happy vs. Control | |
| Response: Sad vs. Control | ||||
| Anticipation: Sad vs. Control | ||||
| He et al., 2022 | Subclinical MDD vs. HC | Performance; Social judgement, likelihood of acceptance followed by acceptance or rejection | “Yes” anticipation followed by Acceptance | |
| “Yes” anticipation followed by Rejection | ||||
| “No” anticipation followed by Acceptance | ||||
| “No” anticipation followed by Rejection | ||||
| Healey et al., 2014 | MDD & Anxiety & HC; Late Adolescents | Passive; Social judgement, acceptance or rejection of high vs. low rated faces, ambiguous feedback control condition | Mutual Liking vs. Received Liking | |
| Positive Feedback vs. Ambiguous Feedback | ||||
| Keedwell et al., 2005 | MDD vs. HC | Happy Mood Condition | ||
| Passive; Mood induction via audio recording, mood-congruent facial display | Sad Mood Condition | |||
| Happy vs. Sad Mood Condition | ||||
| Kumar et al., 2015 | MDD vs. HC | Performance; Monetary Incentive Delay Task with social evaluation manipulation | Response to Reward; Stress vs. No Stress Condition | |
| Laurent & Albow, 2013 | MDD vs. HC; Mothers | Passive; Viewing valenced faces of own vs. other infant | Distressed Faces; Own vs. Other Infant | |
| Morgan et al., 2015 | MDD; Mothers | Passive; Viewing video recordings of own vs. other child, positive vs. negative recordings | Positive Faces; Own Child vs. Stranger | |
| Negative Faces; Own Child vs. Stranger | ||||
| Morgan et al., 2019 | MDD; High Risk vs. Low Risk; Children | Passive; Viewing valenced faces of own vs. other mother | Happy Faces; High Risk vs. Low Risk | Findings account for depression risk status. | 
| Murrough et al., 2015 | MDD vs. HC | Performance; Facial emotion recognition task | All conditions | |
| Nagy et al., 2021 | MDD + Childhood Maltreatment; MDD; HC | Performance; Facial recognition paradigm, match valenced test faces to central target face, shape matching control condition | Face-matching vs. Shape-matching | |
| Penton-Voak et al., 2020 | Sub-Clinical MDD; Intervention vs. No Intervention | Performance; Sex discrimination of valenced faces | Happy Faces vs. Sad Faces | Control: fixation / rest instead of neutral stimulus condition. | 
| Happy Faces vs. Fearful + Sad Faces | ||||
| Happy Faces vs. Rest | ||||
| Perini et al., 2019 | NSSI vs. HC; Adolescents | Performance; Facial emotion recognition of self vs. other, acceptance & rejection in other condition | Anticipation: Self vs. Other | |
| Response: Self vs. Other | ||||
| Quevedo et al., 2018 | MDD vs. HC; Adolescents | Performance; Emotional Self-Other Morph-Query (ESOM-Q) Task | Self vs. Other | |
| Schaefer et al., 2006 | MDD vs. HC | Passive; Social situation viewing, social interaction and facial stimuli, appetitive control condition | Group * Scan Time * Stimulus Condition | Findings account for scan time (pre- vs. post-tx). | 
| Schwartz et al., 2019 | MDD + Anxiety; Adolescents | Performance; Probe response task with probe displayed with valenced or neutral faces | Treatment Main Effect | Findings account for effect of treatment (behavioral therapy). | 
| Treatment Main Effect * Face Emotion * Probe Location | ||||
| Seitz et al., 2023 | Mixed Sample: MDD, PTSD, Somatic Sensory Disorder, HC | Performance; Social Incentive Delay Task | Social Reward Anticipation vs. Neutral Cue | |
| Sharma et al., 2016 | MDD vs. BPD vs. HC | Performance; Sex discrimination followed by valenced facial feedback | Happy Face vs. Angry Face | |
| Happy Face vs. Angry Face * Group * Depression Severity | ||||
| Silk et al., 2014 | MDD vs. HC; Adolescents | Performance; Chatroom task, social acceptance & rejection | Acceptance > Rejection | |
| Silk et al., 2017 | MDD vs. HC; Adolescents | Passive; Listening to audio clips of maternal praise or criticism | Criticism vs. Neutral | |
| Praise vs. Neutral | ||||
| Whittle et al., 2012 | MDD; Adolescents | Passive; Viewing video clips of positive, aggressive, and neutral behavior, own vs. other mother | Positive vs. Neutral Behavior | |
| Aggressive vs. Neutral Behavior | ||||
| Wonch et al., 2016 | Postpartum Depression vs. HC | Passive; Viewing valenced faces of own vs. other infant | Familiar Face vs. Unfamiliar Face | |
| Unfamiliar Face | ||||
| Non-Infant Stimuli | ||||
| All Conditions | ||||
| Yttredahl et al., 2018 | MDD vs. HC | Passive; Viewed highly rated “dating profiles” in scanner, followed by acceptance or rejection | Rejection vs. Neutral | |
| Acceptance vs. Neutral | 
 
Note: ALE = Activation Likelihood Estimate; BPD = Bipolar Major Depressive Disorder; HC = Healthy Control; MDD = Major Depression Disorder; NSSI = non-suicidal self injury