Table 3:

Outcome metrics comparing exAPD algorithm versus the exMPC algorithm in the 2 h after structured exercise started on the in-clinic day

	exAPD	exMPC	Difference	p value (exAPD vs exMPC)	p value (sequence)	p value (period)
% time below range (<3·9 mmol/L)*	4·9 (14·4)	1·4 (4·2)	−3·5 (15·4)	0·29	0·13	0·11
% time in range (3·9–10·0 mmol/L)*	81 (22)	87 (17)	6 (26)	0·25	0·70	>0·99
% high glucose (>10 mmol/L)*	14·2 (20·2)	11·5 (16·6)	−2·7 (21·4)	0·50	0·29	0·30
% very low glucose (<3·0 mmol/L)	0·57 (2·67)	0	··	··	··	··
% very high glucose (>13·9 mmol/L)	1·14 (3·68)	0	··	··	··	··
Mean glucose (mmol/L)	8·0 (1·7)	7·3 (1·6)	−0·8 (1·4)	0·023	0·34	0·64
Rescue carbohydrate (count)	0·27 (0·55)	0·21 (0·41)	−0·06 (0·77)
Insulin (units)†	1·5 (0·9)	1·7 (2·0)	0·2 (1·6)	0·60	0·90	0·95

Data are mean (SD) or difference (SD). The p value for sequence indicates the significance of the sequence of doing the exAPD versus exMPC first. The p value for the period indicates whether the order of doing the intervention, regardless of the type, was significant. exAPD=exercise-aware adaptive proportional derivative. exMPC=exercise-aware model predictive control.

^*p values estimated using bootstrapped standard errors.

^†p values from mixed effects regression model on insulin units.