Manasa 2018.
Study characteristics | |
Methods |
Study design: single‐center parallel‐group RCT Number randomized:
Exclusions after randomization: no Losses to follow‐up
Unit of analysis: participant (1 eye per participant) Number analyzed
Handling of missing data: complete‐case analysis Sample size calculation: NR |
Participants |
Country: India Mean age
Gender
Mean preoperative BCVA in logMAR
Mean preoperative MH index in mm
Mean preoperative MH minimum diameter in mm
Mean preoperative MH base diameter in μm (SD)
Pseudophakia status
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Types of MH in the study: idiopathic Equivalence of baseline characteristics: yes: age, duration, preoperative visual acuity, minimum linear diameter, and MH index were comparable between groups. |
Interventions |
Intervention: PPV with ILM inverted flap (type of inverted flap technique: the ILM flap was inverted and placed over the hole with a soft‐tipped cannula or a diamond‐dusted membrane scraper) Control: PPV with ILM peeling Cointerventions: NR Follow‐up
Type of tamponade: 20% SF6 with air was left in the vitreous cavity. Postoperatively, face‐down positioning was prescribed for 3 days. Number of surgeons performing surgeries: NR |
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes
Secondary outcomes
Safety outcomes: no postoperative complications or adverse events were reported. Time points of measurement: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months |
Notes |
Publication type: published article Funding sources: none reported Disclosures of interest: "The authors declare that they have no competing interests." Trial registry: none reported Study period: NR Subgroup analyses: no Publication language: English |