Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 29;2023:1754956. doi: 10.1155/2023/1754956

Table 2.

Relative recovery (RR) values of the proposed method in the milk samples.

Sample Spiked level Analytes
THE CYZ CAR ATZ MET AZO PRZ
%RR (%RSD, n = 3)
PSM Level 1 95.7 (2.6) 93.0 (4.9) 92.8 (4.3) 87.7 (7.3) 90.2 (5.5) 92.8 (6.1) 108.8 (3.3)
Level 2 93.3 (4.2) 94.2 (3.0) 104.6 (5.5) 92.3 (8.0) 87.5 (4.8) 89.7 (5.4) 96.7 (2.7)

PMM Level 1 97.9 (7.3) 93.2 (4.6) 91.7 (4.6) 87.9 (7.0) 91.6 (4.1) 85.9 (4.6) 108.3 (8.9)
Level 2 92.9 (7.0) 94.3 (3.1) 97.5 (5.0) 91.3 (3.4) 90.0 (4.0) 88.5 (7.0) 92.9 (3.3)

RSM Level 1 96.0 (7.8) 86.3 (8.9) 88.4 (11.4) 88.2 (8.4) 85.3 (10.3) 88.6 (5.2) 94.2 (11.3)
Level 2 97.1 (10.6) 91.6 (6.2) 97.0 (8.0) 92.5 (5.1) 92.8 (9.2) 87.1 (6.2) 89.5 (10.9)

PSM, pasteurized milk sample one; PMM, pasteurized milk sample two; and RSM, raw sululta milk sample. Level 1 : 10 μg/L for CAR; 15 μg/L for THE, CYZ, ATZ, and PRZ; 30 μg/L for AZO; 45 μg/L for MET. Level 2 : 100 μg/L for CAR; 130 μg/L for THE, CYZ, ATZ, and PRZ; 260 μg/L for AZO; 390 μg/L for MET.