Table 5.
Regression dynamic model (1) by using a two-step system GMM and LSDVC estimations.
Independent variables | Two-step system GMM estimation NPL is the dependent variable |
LSDVC estimation NPL is the dependent variable |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) |
(2) |
|||||||
Coef. | Std Err. | Coef. | Std Err. | Coef. | Std Err. | Coef. | Std Err. | |
lag.NPL | 0.4893*** | 0.0360 | 0.4618*** | 0.0299 | 0.0655*** | 0.0001 | 0.0650*** | 0.0001 |
LC1 | −0.0107* | 0.0060 | −0.0507** | 0.0201 | ||||
LC2 | −0.0116** | 0.0057 | −0.0241* | 0.0130 | ||||
BFD | 0.0066 | 0.0080 | 0.0073 | 0.0053 | 0.0762*** | 0.0130 | 0.0944*** | 0.0122 |
SIZE | 0.0016 | 0.0014 | 0.0010 | 0.0018 | 0.0760*** | 0.0238 | 0.0831*** | 0.0164 |
ROA | −0.4665*** | 0.0650 | −0.4070*** | 0.1050 | 1.3302*** | 0.3640 | 1.1927*** | 0.2797 |
CAP | 0.0683*** | 0.0147 | 0.0557** | 0.0237 | −0.1560*** | 0.0518 | −0.1539*** | 0.0499 |
LG | −0.0015 | 0.0035 | 0.0009 | 0.0027 | −0.0074* | 0.0041 | −0.0067 | 0.0048 |
INF | 0.0318*** | 0.0080 | 0.0262*** | 0.0077 | 0.1771*** | 0.0218 | 0.1677*** | 0.0251 |
GDP | −0.0566*** | 0.0185 | −0.0603*** | 0.0187 | −0.1491 | 0.7325 | −0.1054 | 0.4781 |
Constant | −0.0112 | 0.0228 | −0.0019 | 0.0283 | ||||
Observations | 337 | 337 | 337 | 337 | ||||
Instruments | 59 | 59 | ||||||
Number of groups | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 | ||||
AR (1) test | 0.007 | 0.006 | ||||||
AR (2) test | 0.440 | 0.492 | ||||||
Sargan test | 0.287 | 0.275 |
Note: Table 5 summarizes the regression results with the NPL dependent variable by using a two-step system GMM and LSDVC estimations. Column (1) shows the GMM regressions and Column (2) reports estimated results with the LSDVC method. AR (1) and AR (2) tests show tests for correlations at lag (1) and lag (2). The Sargan test confirms the validity of instrumental variables. The LSDVC in this section, initialized by AB, is bootstrapped by 50 iterations for the standard errors (Bun & Kiviet, 2003 and Bruno, 2005). All variable definitions are displayed in Table 1. ***, **, and * indicate significance levels at 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.