Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 22;9(9):e19141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19141

Table 7.

Moderating role of bank size in the effects of liquidity creation and bank funding diversification on non-performing loans.


Independent variables
NPL is the dependent variable (1)
NPL is the dependent variable (2)
Coef. Std Err. Coef. Std Err.
lag.NPL 0.1215*** 0.0001 0.4415*** 0.0469
DUM*LC1 −0.0396*** 0.0078
DUM*LC2 −0.0277** 0.0113
DUM*BFD 0.0456*** 0.0038 0.0158*** 0.0057
LC1 −0.0274* 0.0157
LC2 −0.0131 0.0102
BFD 0.0591** 0.0268 0.0241** 0.0108
ROA 0.4454*** 0.1127 0.4257*** 0.1493
CAP −0.5268*** 0.0240 −0.0794*** 0.0236
LG −0.0386*** 0.0059 0.0017 0.0036
INF 0.2129*** 0.0251 0.0735*** 0.0158
GDP −0.8120*** 0.1377 −0.0683 0.0459

Note: Table 7 reports the regression results from the dynamic model (2) by using the LSDVC. We use a dummy (DUM) variable that represents large banks. DUM equals one if the bank scale is above the median size and otherwise. Interaction variables (DUM*LC and DUM*BFD) are created to estimate the moderating role of bank scale on the impact of liquidity creation (LC) and bank funding diversification (BFD) on non-performing loans (NPL). The LSDVC initialized by AB is bootstrapped by 50 iterations for the standard errors (Bun & Kiviet, 2003 and Bruno, 2005). ***, **, and * indicate significance levels at 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively.