Table 1.
Interaction of G-CK with amino acid residues of ACE2 (6M0J).
| Protein | Compound | Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | H-Bond Interactions | Other Interactions | No. of H-Bond |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACE2 | G-CK | −8.0 | ASP350, ASP382, TYR385, ASN394, ARG393, HIS401 | TRP349 | 6 |
| Dexamethasone | −7.8 | SER47, ASP382, TYR385, HIS401 | – | 4 | |
| Indinavir | −9.0 | ALA348, ASP350, TYR385 | THR347, TRP349, ASP382, ARG393, HIS401 | 3 | |
| Remdesivir | −8.1 | ASP206, LYS562 | LEU95, TRP203, VAL209, PRO565 | 2 | |
| Camostat | −7.4 | SER43, ASP350, ASP382, TYR385, ASN394, HIS401 | SER47, MET62, TRP349 | 6 | |
| Chloroquine | −6.5 | TYR196 | TYR202, GLY205, GLU208, GLU564 | 1 | |
| NAG | −6.2 | ASP350, ASP382, TYR385, ARG393, HIS401 | PHE40, ALA348 | 5 |
From the point of view of binding energy, as well as having almost similar H-bond and other types of interaction to the controls at the allosteric site of ACE2, G-CK shows strong interactions with the main host-based target ACE2 of the new coronavirus, showing G-CK might be a promising ACE2 inhibitor (Fig. 1). Hence, the G-CK and Dexamethasone in complex with ACE2 has been further utilized for molecular dynamics simulation to validate the docking scores and other properties.