Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 6;9(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41514-023-00119-z

Table 5.

Results of GLMM-LASSO analysis for performance and cognitive workload evaluation at Matchboard levels 2 and 3 based on approach B (96 features extracted from 116 EEG signals).

Predictors Estimate p-value
Performance, Matchboard level 2
Average strength in Parietal cortex, at theta-band frequencies −34.49 0.014
Random Effect; Subjects’ standard deviation: 106.26
Number of observations: 82; R2: 0.67; MAE:5.61; RMSE: 7.23
Cognitive workload, Matchboard level 2
Average temporal network flexibility in Occipital cortex at alpha-band frequencies 1.44 0.034
Average temporal network flexibility in Parietal cortex at theta-band frequencies −2.19 0.004
Average PSD in Frontal cortex at beta-band frequencies −3.33 <0.001
Random Effect; Subjects’ standard deviation: 284.2
Number of observations: 62; R2: 0.97; MAE: 1.81; RMSE: 2.29
Performance, Matchboard level 3
Average search information in Frontal cortex at beta-band frequencies −17.93 0.031
Average search information in Temporal cortex at beta-band frequencies 22.7 0.022
Average search information in Frontal cortex at gamma-band frequencies −19.23 0.021
Average search information in Frontal cortex at alpha-band frequencies 29.09 0.035
Average PSD in Occipital cortex at gamma-band frequencies 9.24 0.029
Average PSD in Parietal cortex at gamma-band frequencies −11.81 0.049
Random Effect; Subjects’ standard deviation: 33.32
Number of observations: 111; R2: 0.54; MAE: 8.57; RMSE: 10.48
Cognitive workload, Matchboard level 3
Average temporal network flexibility in Frontal cortex at theta-band frequencies 1.99 0.024
Average strength in Temporal cortex at beta-band frequencies −10.13 0.001
Average PSD in Frontal cortex at beta-band frequencies 8.44 0.002
Random Effect; Subjects’ standard deviation: 421.94
Number of observations: 83; R2: 0.95; MAE: 3.44; RMSE: 4.18