Table 1.
Hydrogel types | Swelling ratios | Merits | Demerits | Fabrications | Biomedical applications | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High‐swelling hydrogels | >150% |
High wound exudates absorption capacity, high cell recruitment and migration, high drug entrapment, diffusion and release |
Macroscopic volume expansion, poor mechanical stability, weakened bioadhesion and conductivity, risk of tissue compression damage |
Chemical modification, hydrophilic polymer self‐crosslinking, adding small molecule cross‐linkers |
Tissue engineering, drug delivery |
[12] |
Non‐swelling hydrogels | 0–150% |
Excellent dimensional stability, long‐term wet‐adhesion performance, persistent mechanical strength and conductivity |
Low drug loading and release efficiency, cannot exchange nutrients and bioactive molecules, low cell attachment, complex cross‐linked network design process |
Functional polymer self‐crosslinking, synthesizing amphiphilic copolymer, polymer self‐assembling, adding small molecule cross‐linkers, solvent exchange, surface hydrophobic grafting |
Tissue engineering, bioelectronics |
[13] |
Shrinkable hydrogels | <0% |
Stimuli‐responsive, mechanically active, dynamic stiffening and contraction, promoted cell attachment and condensation, remotely controlled drug release |
Risk of tissue tension damage, complicated molecular structure regulation process |
Synthesizing stimuli‐responsive copolymer, introducing a second polymer, adding small molecule cross‐linkers |
Tissue engineering, drug delivery |
[14] |