Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 31;9(9):e19532. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19532

Table A1.

PRISMA 2009 checklist [11].

Section/Topic Number Checklist Item Reported Note
Title
Title 1 Determine whether the study is a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both. Yes
Abstract
Structured summary 2 Offer a structured summary including: background; objectives; data sources; study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions; study appraisal and synthesis methods; results; limitations; conclusions and implications of key findings; and systematic review registration number. Yes
Introduction
Rationale 3 Report the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Yes
Section 1.2.
Objectives 4 Offer an explicit statement of questions being addressed with respect to participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design. Yes
Section 1.3.
Methods
Protocol and registration 5 Report whether a review protocol exists, where it can be accessed, and, if available, report registration number.
Eligibility criteria 6 Describe study characteristics and report characteristics used as criteria for eligibility, giving rationale. Yes
Section 2.1.
Information sources 7 Report all information sources in the search and date last searched. Yes
Section 2.2.
Search 8 Report full electronic search strategy for at least one database, reporting any limits used, so that it can be repeated. Yes
Section 2.3.
Study selection 9 Report the process for selecting studies. Yes
Section 2.4.
Data collection process 10 Report method of data extraction from reports and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. Yes
Section 2.5.
Data items 11 Report all variables for which data were sought. Yes
Section 2.6.
Risk of bias in individual studies 12 Report methods used for assessing risk of bias of individual studies. Yes
Section 2.7.
Summary measures 13 Report the principal summary measures. MA
Synthesis of results 14 Report the methods of handling data and combining results of studies. MA
Risk of bias across studies 15 Report any assessment of risk of bias that may affect the cumulative evidence. MA
Additional analyses 16 Report methods of additional analyses. MA
Results
Study selection 17 Report number of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally with a flow diagram. Yes
Section 3.1.
Study characteristics 18 For each study, report characteristics for which data were extracted and offer the citations. Yes
Section 3.2.
Risk of bias within studies 19 Report data on risk of bias of each study and, if available, any outcome level assessment (see item 12). Yes
Section 3.3.
Results of individual studies 20 For all outcomes considered (benefits or harms), report, for each study. MA
Synthesis of results 21 Report results of each meta-analysis done. MA
Risk of bias across studies 22 Report results of any assessment of risk of bias across studies (see Item 15). MA
Additional analysis 23 Provide results of additional analyses, if done (see Item 16). MA
Discussion
Summary of evidence 24 Outline the main findings including the strength of evidence for each main outcome. Yes
Section 4.2.
Limitations 25 Discuss limitations. Yes
Section 4.3.
Conclusions 26 Offer a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence, and implications for future research. Yes
Section 5.
Funding
Funding 27 Report sources of funding for the systematic review and other support. Yes

* Meta-analysis (MA).