Table 2.
Designed experiments to study the influence of CQD on the detection of AChE and its inhibitors.
| Std* | Run order | Time (min) | CQD/En ratio (%) | CQD type | Df %** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 1 | 3 | 16 | S-doped | 34.01884 |
| 8 | 2 | 9.5 | 18.5 | Pure | 29.73972 |
| 15 | 3 | 16 | 16 | S-doped | 29.04908 |
| 24 | 4 | 16 | 4 | P-doped | 27.19716 |
| 10 | 5 | 9.5 | 10 | Pure | 32.89456 |
| 27 | 6 | 0.3 | 10 | P-doped | 31.78781 |
| 6 | 7 | 18.7 | 10 | Pure | 27.96525 |
| 29 | 8 | 9.5 | 1.5 | P-doped | 29.45529 |
| 25 | 9 | 3 | 16 | P-doped | 31.10656 |
| 12 | 10 | 3 | 4 | S-doped | 33.52306 |
| 19 | 11 | 9.5 | 18.5 | S-doped | 31.17059 |
| 1 | 12 | 3 | 4 | Pure | 37.05767 |
| 18 | 13 | 9.5 | 1.5 | S-doped | 32.66461 |
| 26 | 14 | 16 | 16 | P-doped | 26.05196 |
| 9 | 15 | 9.5 | 10 | Pure | 29.05567 |
| 28 | 16 | 18.7 | 10 | P-doped | 25.49794 |
| 3 | 17 | 3 | 16 | Pure | 30.24026 |
| 17 | 18 | 18.7 | 10 | S-doped | 31.26231 |
| 22 | 19 | 9.5 | 10 | S-doped | 29.20168 |
| 20 | 20 | 9.5 | 10 | S-doped | 32.02089 |
| 33 | 21 | 9.5 | 10 | P-doped | 27.97358 |
| 30 | 22 | 9.5 | 18.5 | P-doped | 25.51604 |
| 16 | 23 | 0.3 | 10 | S-doped | 33.58546 |
| 31 | 24 | 9.5 | 10 | P-doped | 32.56716 |
| 21 | 25 | 9.5 | 10 | S-doped | 31.25895 |
| 5 | 26 | 0.3 | 10 | Pure | 33.61139 |
| 7 | 27 | 9.5 | 1.5 | Pure | 35.37244 |
| 23 | 28 | 3 | 4 | P-doped | 28.97916 |
| 4 | 29 | 16 | 16 | Pure | 29.18125 |
| 32 | 30 | 9.5 | 10 | P-doped | 30.17559 |
| 2 | 31 | 16 | 4 | Pure | 29.4359 |
| 13 | 32 | 16 | 4 | S-doped | 31.98053 |
| 11 | 33 | 9.5 | 10 | Pure | 30.63094 |
Std: Standard deviation **Df: Desirability function.