. 2023 Sep 3;9(9):e19730. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19730

Table 5.

The % of chemical composition (proximate analysis) per dry sample weight of three duckweed samples dried at 60 °C for 6 h, with No.14 as the control.

Sample	% Fat	% Crude fiber	% Ash	% Moisture	% Carbohydrate
No.6	1.560 ± 0.50^ab	4.073 ± 0.73^b	25.351 ± 0.85^d	4.750 ± 0.16^b	9.381 ± 0.37^a
No.10	1.183 ± 0.14^a	4.835 ± 0.46^b	18.872 ± 0.07^a	4.635 ± 0.16^b	8.773 ± 1.50^a
No.12	1.997 ± 0.08^b	4.456 ± 0.71^b	22.057 ± 0.70^b	3.292 ± 0.17^a	14.119 ± 1.63^b
No.14	1.019 ± 0.22^a	2.446 ± 0.15^a	24.064 ± 0.71^c	4.851 ± 0.25^b	42.141 ± 1.68^c

Note: *Results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation of three iterations (n = 3) with different letters a–h in the same column (P < 0.05) (Duncan's New Multiple Range Test).