Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 14;9(9):e19772. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19772

Table 1.

The inhibitory activity of extracts and fraction and molecular docking compounds 1–5 on sEH.

Inhibitory activity at 50 μg/mL(%)a I IC50 value (μM)a Inhibition type(Ki, μM) Autodockscore(kcal/mol);
Hydrogen bonds(Å)
a 30.6 ± 2.5 1 8.9 ± 0.8 Competitive (9.0 ± 0.8) −10.96;
Asp335(2.71), Ile363(3.03), Gln384(3.09)
b 37.4 ± 1.2
c 6.3 ± 1.8 2 18.3 ± 1.0 Competitive (6.9 ± 0.7) −11.20;
Asp335(2.96), Tyr343(2.72), Ile363(2.83, 2.88), Pro371(2.76, 3.00)
d 11.0 ± 6.0
e 8.9 ± 2.0
f 5.6 ± 1.9 3 8.3 ± 1.1 Competitive (9.9 ± 0.8) −10.69;
Tyr343(2.71), Ile363(3.01), Pro371(2.71, 2.86)
g 12.3 ± 2.8 4 3.2 ± 0.4 Competitive (1.8 ± 0.4) −8.48;
Asp335(2.83),
Leu408(2.87, 3.11)
h >100 5 3.3 ± 0.3 Competitive (1.5 ± 0.2) −14.80;
Asp335(2.59), Tyr383(2.81), Gln384(2.93), Ile363(2.98), Trp473(2.85), Met469(2.57)
i 47.5 ± 2.5 6b 24.1 ± 0.1 nM

a: seed, b: hull, c: nut, d: Oil, e: cake, f: n-hexane fraction, g: Chloroform, h: ethyl acetate, i: water.

a

All compounds examined in a set of triplicated experiment.

b

Positive control(AUDA).