Table 2.
Ablations of different initialization schemes for slow nodes on heterophilic datasets
| Dataset | linear interpolation | zero | random |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 72.88 ± 7.17 | 61.80 ± 5.91 | 53.33 ± 5.27 |
| Actor | 33.39 ± 1.29 | 28.93 ± 2.83 | 24.70 ± 1.16 |
| Cornell | 63.33 ± 5.70 | 49.55 ± 7.06 | 37.48 ± 6.93 |
We report the performance for the GCN model and the Half-Hop augmentation applied with each of the different initialization schemes.