Table 2.
Loading of TRM in and entrapment efficiency of formulations NT1 to NT9.
| Formulation | Entrapment Efficiency (%) | TRM Loading (%) |
|---|---|---|
| NT1 | 52.32 ± 1.213 | 43.43 ± 1.13 |
| NT2 | 56.56 ± 1.215 | 48.76 ± 1.125 |
| NT3 | 59.45 ± 1.314 | 55.34 ± 1.149 |
| NT4 | 51.39 ± 1.412 | 45.56 ± 1.251 |
| NT5 | 61.45 ± 1.514 | 58.76 ± 1.259 |
| NT6 | 69.56 ± 1.912 | 63.19 ± 1.271 |
| NT7 | 65.89 ± 2.325 | 61.67 ± 1.291 |
| NT8 | 92.34 ± 2.671 | 87.45 ± 1.309 |
| NT9 | 87.49 ± 2.421 | 82.45 ± 1.301 |