Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 7;15:159. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01575-w

Table 2.

Sensitivity analyses of serum iron biomarkers in 2021 datasets with epigenetic aging accelerations

Exposure Outcome Weighted median MR-egger regression Heterogeneitya MR-PRESSO outlier detectb Pleiotropyc
Beta (95% CI) P Value Beta (95% CI) P value Beta (95% CI) P Value
Ferritin Grim − 0.17 (− 0.57, 0.22) 3.86E−01 0.33 (− 0.26, 0.92) 2.77E−01 I2 = 30.9%; Cochrane Q = 101; P = 0.008 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.010; P = 0.374
Ferritin Hannum − 0.08 (− 0.45, 0.30) 6.85E−01 0.35 (− 0.17, 0.87) 1.95E−01 I2 = 17%; Cochrane Q = 84; P = 0.116 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.012; P = 0.217
Ferritin IE 0.07 (− 0.35, 0.49) 7.53E−01 0.16 (− 0.43, 0.76) 5.91E−01 I2 = 30.7%; Cochrane Q = 101; P = 0.009 -0.02 (-0.31, 0.27) 8.88E−01 Intercept = -0.003; P = 0.821
Ferritin Pheno 0.24 (− 0.27, 0.75) 3.58E−01 0.70 (0.02, 1.39) 4.90E−02 I2 = 17%; Cochrane Q = 84; P = 0.117 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.011; P = 0.418
Iron Grim 0.53 (0.18, 0.87) 2.82E−03 0.45 (0.06, 0.84) 3.01E−02 I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 28; P = 0.743 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.011; P = 0.374
Iron Hannum 0.47 (0.12, 0.81) 7.57E−03 0.55 (0.18, 0.93) 6.71E−03 I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 28; P = 0.75 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.019; P = 0.125
Iron IE 0.67 (0.29, 1.04) 5.01E−04 0.75 (0.30, 1.21) 2.79E−03 I2 = 29.5%; Cochrane Q = 47; P = 0.056 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.021; P = 0.159
Iron Pheno 0.24 (− 0.21, 0.68) 2.93E−01 0.45 (− 0.16, 1.07) 1.60E−01 I2 = 35.8%; Cochrane Q = 53; P = 0.02 0.36 (0.03, 0.69) 3.96E−02 Intercept = -0.012; P = 0.534
Iron binding capacity Grim − 0.09 (− 0.32, 0.15) 4.71E−01 0.05 (− 0.25, 0.34) 7.66E−01 I2 = 27.8%; Cochrane Q = 78; P = 0.03 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.007; P = 0.553
Iron binding capacity Hannum 0.01 (− 0.20, 0.22) 9.18E−01 − 0.11 (− 0.37, 0.14) 3.94E−01 I2 = 6.6%; Cochrane Q = 60; P = 0.333 No significant outliers Intercept = 0.001; P = 0.951
Iron binding capacity IE − 0.02 (− 0.28, 0.23) 8.58E−01 − 0.15 (− 0.49, 0.18) 3.72E−01 I2 = 42.3%; Cochrane Q = 97; P = 0.001 No significant outliers Intercept = 0.009; P = 0.501
Iron binding capacity Pheno − 0.17 (− 0.44, 0.10) 2.19E−01 − 0.06 (− 0.43, 0.30) 7.29E−01 I2 = 22.5%; Cochrane Q = 72; P = 0.071 No significant outliers Intercept = 0.005; P = 0.728
Transferrin saturation Grim 0.24 (− 0.01, 0.49) 6.08E−02 0.18 (− 0.13, 0.49) 2.65E−01 I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 38; P = 0.547 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.001; P = 0.909
Transferrin saturation Hannum 0.26 (0.01, 0.52) 4.38E−02 0.29 (− 0.02, 0.59) 7.63E−02 I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 37; P = 0.626 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.004; P = 0.700
Transferrin saturation IE 0.22 (− 0.04, 0.47) 9.78E−02 0.35 (− 0.03, 0.73) 7.80E−02 I2 = 29.4%; Cochrane Q = 57; P = 0.042 No significant outliers Intercept = -0.009; P = 0.490
Transferrin saturation Pheno 0.38 (0.03, 0.73) 3.13E−02 0.64 (0.11, 1.17) 2.31E−02 I2 = 45.1%; Cochrane Q = 73; P = 0.001 0.38 (0.11, 0.65) 9.17E−03 Intercept = -0.025; P = 0.183

aHeterogeneity in the random effect IVW methods was reported

bMR-PRESSO (NbDistribution = 10,000, P < 0.05)

cMR-Egger was used to detect pleiotropy. There is no pleiotropy was observed among all analyses (P > 0.05)

CI, confidence interval, MR-PRESSO, Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier, IE Intrinsic epigenetic