Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 7;21:698. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04572-y

Table 2.

Performance comparison among LPAIDS, model W, and model N

Accuracy (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) AUC
Images
 LPAIDS (All images) 0·956 (0·951–0·960) 0·948 (0·941–0·955) 0·964 (0·958–0·970) 0·965 (0·959–0·971) 0·946 (0·939–0·953) 0·974
 Model W (WLI images) 0·948 (0·942–0·954) 0·885 (0·870–0·899) 0·988 (0·984–0·992) 0·978 (0·971–0·985) 0·932 (0·923–0·941) 0·955
 LPAIDS (WLI images) 0·957 (0·951–0·962) 0·918 (0·906–0·931) 0·980 (0·975–0·985) 0·967 (0·959–0·975) 0·950 (0·943–0·958) 0·964
 Model N (NBI images) 0·935 (0·926–0·945) 0·978 (0·971–0·984) 0·798 (0·765–0·831) 0·940 (0·930–0·951) 0·917 (0·893–0·941) 0·978
 LPAIDS (NBI images) 0·954 (0·946–0·962) 0·977 (0·971–0·984) 0·878 (0·852–0·905) 0·963 (0·955–0·971) 0·923 (0·900–0·945) 0·981
Videos
 LPAIDS (All videos) 0·949 (0·931–0·968) 0·948 (0·922–0·974) 0·951 (0·924–0·977) 0·955 (0·930–0·979) 0·943 (0·916–0·971) 0·974
 Model W (WLI videos) 0·945 (0·921–0·968) 0·886 (0·835–0·937) 0·986 (0·970–1·000) 0·978 (0·953–1·000) 0·925 (0·890–0·959) 0·948
 LPAIDS (WLI videos) 0·950 (0.928–0.973) 0·919 (0·876–0·963) 0·972 (0·949–0·994) 0·958 (0·925–0·991) 0·945 (0·915–0·975) 0·968
 Model N (NBI videos) 0·926 (0·889–0·963) 0·971 (0·943–0·999) 0·804 (0·695–0·913) 0·931 (0·890–0·972) 0·911 (0·828–0·994) 0·974
 LPAIDS (NBI videos) 0·947 (0·916–0·979) 0·978 (0·954–1·000) 0·863 (0·768–0·957) 0·951 (0·916–0·986) 0·936 (0·866–1·000) 0·974

AUC: area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value;CI: confidence interval; LPAIDS: Laryngopharyngeal Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System; NBI: narrow-band imaging; NPV, negative predictive value; WLI: white light imaging