Table 1.
Presented design comparison with design published in the literature.
| Ref | Size (mm × mm) | Isolation of simple design (dB) | Isolation refined (dB) | Gain (dB) | Operational Bandwidth (GHz) | Number of Antennas | The technique used to refine isolation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [24] | 20 × 20 | −16 | −24 | – | 27.5–28.35 | 2 | Metal strip |
| [25] | 85 × 21 | −22 | −38 | 16.3 | 27–32 | 2 | Meta surface |
| [26] | 30 × 35 | −15 | −40 | 12 | 27.5–28.5 | 4 | Parasitic Patch |
| [27] | 30 × 43 | −32 | −45 | 10.2 | 24.55–26.5 | 4 | Meta surface |
| [28] | 25 × 15 | −14 | −41 | 6.3 | 26–30.5 | 2 | DRA |
| [29] | 48 × 31 | – | −21 | 10 | 26–31 | 4 | Parasitic Patch |
| [30] | 26 × 14.5 | −19 | −22 | 4.5 | 27–29 | 2 | Meta surface |
| [31] | 20 × 40 | −18 | −28 | 9 | 27.5–28.5 | 4 | Meta surface |
| Prop. | 12 × 20 | −18 | −29 | 9.25 | 24–30.25 | 2 | Parasitic Patch |