Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022 Jun 15;132(5):578–588. doi: 10.1177/00034894221104939

TABLE 4.

Quality, risk of bias, funding & COI assessment of RCTs

Author, year CEBM level Random sequence allocation Allocation concealment Blinding participants/personnel Blinding outcome assessment Incomplete outcome Selective reporting Other sources Funding COI
Plaza, 201116 2 −1 0 −1 −1 −1 1 0 Non-industry unclear
Achar, 201217 2 −1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 0 NR unclear
Cutler, 201318 2 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 0 Industry Yes
Marzetti, 201419 2 1 1 1 0 0 −1 0 Non-industry None
Hathorn, 201520 2 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 0 Industry No
Bizaki, 20169 2 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 0 Non-industry None
Chandra, 201621 2 −1 −1 1 0 −1 −1 0 Industry Yes
Minni, 201822 2 0 0 1 1 −1 0 0 NR No
Hanci, 202012 2 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 0 NR No

CEBM- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, NR- not reported; High risk of bias = 1, unknown risk of bias = 0, low risk of bias = −1