Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 15;9(9):e20203. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20203

Table 2.

Combined variance analysis on 33 sweet potato in three environments.

Source df Yield (tons.ha−1)
Sweetness (oBrix)
Moisture Content (%)
Tuber Diameter (cm)
Tuber Length (cm)
SS %TSS SS %TSS SS %TSS SS %TSS SS %TSS
Genotypes (G) 32 17656.00 ** 34.41 48.90 ** 39.66 5969.00 ** 88.72 139.80 ** 32.79 812.00 * 26.33
Environments (E) 2 2643.00 * 5.15 237.40 * 19.34 35.00 * 0.52 7.40 * 1.74 4.00 ns 0.13
Block (E) 6 2850.00 ** 5.55 12.20 ns 0.99 20.00 ns 0.30 2.90 ns 0.68 30.00 ns 0.97
GEIs 64 28157.00 ** 54.88 491.20 ** 40.01 704.00 ** 10.46 276.30 ** 64.80 2238.00 ** 72.57
Error 192 3506.00 * 310.10 * 409.00 * 205.60 * 3086.00 *
Mean 25.18 8.73 65.78 5.08 18.67
SD 13.58 2.26 4.85 1.46 4.50
CV (%) 16.99 13.88 1.78 20.52 28.28

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; SD = Standard Deviation; CV = Coefficient of Variations; SS = Sum of Square; GEIs = Genotype-by-environment interactions.