Table 3.
Multi-group SEM Model to predict self-reported intimidation (active bullying) behaviors.
Group 1: Males | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Path | SPC | S.E. | C.R. | P | ||
Intimidation | ⟵ | Risk Perception | −.096 | .009 | −1.879 | ** |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Academic Performance | −.211 | .008 | −4.081 | *** |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Sensation Seeking | .108 | .008 | 2.273 | * |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Interaction with ICTs | −.029 | .006 | −.604 | .546 |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Parental Conflict | .105 | .003 | 2.029 | * |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Psychological Distress | .112 | .014 | 2.094 | * |
Intimidation |
⟵ |
Life Satisfaction |
−.129 |
.012 |
−2.411 |
* |
Group 2: Females | ||||||
Path |
SPC1 |
S.E.2 |
C.R.3 |
p4 |
||
Intimidation | ⟵ | Risk Perception | −.150 | .005 | −2.977 | ** |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Academic Performance | −.005 | .004 | −.104 | .917 |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Sensation Seeking | .002 | .004 | .048 | .962 |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Interaction with ICTs | −.160 | .004 | −3.02 | ** |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Parental Conflict | .111 | .002 | 2.172 | * |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Psychological Distress | −.004 | .005 | −.071 | .944 |
Intimidation | ⟵ | Life Satisfaction | −.025 | .005 | −.470 | .639 |
Notes:1 SPC = Standardized Path Coefficients (can be interpreted as β-linear regression weights); 2 S E. = Standard Error; 3 C R. = Critical Ratio; 4 p-values; *Significant at the level <0.050; **Significant at the level <0.010; ***Significant at the level <0.001.