Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 19;9(9):e20268. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20268

Table 5.

Comparison study of sorption capacity (qe) of Cd(II), IBU and MB for different biosorbents.

Biosorbent qe (mg/g) Pollutant Reference
Pomegranate husk carbon/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP 92.75 Cd(II)
This study
Pinecone 92.70 [76]
Barley husk 75.20 [77]
Pomegranate husk activated carbon 68.60 [78]
Modified pomegranate husk 46.29 [79]
Rice husk biochar
17.8
[80]
Activated coconut husk 76.92 IBU
[81]
Activated carbon oak 45.45 [82]
Pomegranate husk carbon/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP 39.80 This study
Cocoa shell 38.95 [83]
Sugarcane bagasse 13.51 [84]
Olive waste cake
12.90
[85]
Banana peel 250.0 MB [14]
Watermelon rinds 188.8 [12]
Coconut leaf 112.3 [27]
Pomegranate husk carbon/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP 95.77 This study
Palmyrah sprout casing 27.67 [86]
Maize stalk pith 7.330 [87]