Table 5.
Comparison study of sorption capacity (qe) of Cd(II), IBU and MB for different biosorbents.
Biosorbent | qe (mg/g) | Pollutant | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Pomegranate husk carbon/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP | 92.75 | Cd(II) |
This study |
Pinecone | 92.70 | [76] | |
Barley husk | 75.20 | [77] | |
Pomegranate husk activated carbon | 68.60 | [78] | |
Modified pomegranate husk | 46.29 | [79] | |
Rice husk biochar |
17.8 |
[80] |
|
Activated coconut husk | 76.92 | IBU |
[81] |
Activated carbon oak | 45.45 | [82] | |
Pomegranate husk carbon/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP | 39.80 | This study | |
Cocoa shell | 38.95 | [83] | |
Sugarcane bagasse | 13.51 | [84] | |
Olive waste cake |
12.90 |
[85] |
|
Banana peel | 250.0 | MB | [14] |
Watermelon rinds | 188.8 | [12] | |
Coconut leaf | 112.3 | [27] | |
Pomegranate husk carbon/Fe(II)–Fe(III) NP | 95.77 | This study | |
Palmyrah sprout casing | 27.67 | [86] | |
Maize stalk pith | 7.330 | [87] |