Summary of findings 1. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) compared to placebo for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants.
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) compared to placebo for preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants | ||||||
Patient or population: preterm infants at risk of developing BPD Setting: neonatal intensive care units Intervention: SOD Comparison: placebo | ||||||
Outcomes | Relative effect (95% CI) | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | What happens | ||
Without SOD | With SOD | Difference | ||||
BPD defined as an oxygen requirement at 28 days № of participants: 302 (1 RCT) | RR 1.09 (0.94 to 1.26) | Study population | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1 | The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of superoxide dismutase on BPD defined as an oxygen requirement at 28 days compared to placebo. | ||
66.9% | 72.9% (62.9 to 84.3) | 6.0% more (4 fewer to 17.4 more) | ||||
BPD defined as oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age № of participants: 335 (2 RCTs) | RR 0.96 (0.72 to 1.29) | Study population | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1 | The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of superoxide dismutase on BPD defined as an oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age compared to placebo. | ||
35.2% | 33.8% (25.4 to 45.4) | 1.4% fewer (9.9 fewer to 10.2 more) | ||||
Neonatal mortality (i.e. within 28 days) № of participants: 335 (2 RCTs) | RR 0.98 (0.57 to 1.68) | Study population | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1 | The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of superoxide dismutase on neonatal mortality compared to placebo. | ||
13.8% | 13.6% (7.9 to 23.2) | 0.3% fewer (5.9 fewer to 9.4 more) | ||||
Mortality prior to discharge № of participants: 78 (2 RCTs) | RR 1.20 (0.53 to 2.71) | Study population | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1 | The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of superoxide dismutase on mortality prior to discharge compared to placebo. | ||
22.9% | 27.4% (12.1 to 61.9) | 4.6% more (10.7 fewer to 39.1 more) | ||||
BPD or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age № of participants: 0 (0 RCTs) | Not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported this outcome. |
Need for supplemental oxygen (days) № of participants: 0 (0 RCTs) | Not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported this outcome. |
Retinopathy of prematurity № of participants: 277 (2 RCTs) | RR 0.95 (0.78 to 1.15) | Study population | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1 | The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of superoxide dismutase on retinopathy of prematurity (any stage) compared to placebo. | ||
61.1% | 58.0% (47.6 to 70.2) | 3.1% fewer (13.4 fewer to 9.2 more) | ||||
Severe retinopathy of prematurity (stage II or greater) № of participants: 244 (1 RCT) | RR 0.97 (0.57 to 1.65) | Study population | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ Very low 1 | The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of superoxide dismutase on severe retinopathy of prematurity (stage II or greater) compared to placebo. | ||
18.3% | 17.7% (10.1 to 29.3) | 0.6% fewer (8.2 fewer to 11 more) | ||||
Moderate to severe neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 to 24 months № of participants: 0 (0 RCTs) | Not reported | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No studies reported this outcome. |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
1 downgrade one level for risk of bias: unclear risk in multiple domains; downgrade two levels for imprecision: few events, small sample size, confidence interval overlapping the no difference line