TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests of P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and β-lactam agents by the novel ATP-bioluminescence method, the standard ATP-bioluminescence method, and the microdilution method
Antimicrobial agent (MIC [μg/ml]a) | Concn (μg/ml) | Novel ATP method
|
Standard ATP method
|
Result with microdilution methodd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioluminescence (RLU) | ATP indexb | Resultc | Bioluminescence (RLU) | ATP indexb | Resultc | |||
Piperacillin (3.13) | 5 | 63 | 13.3 | − | 310 | 76.0 | + | − |
10 | 81 | 17.2 | − | 516 | 126.5 | + | − | |
30 | 40 | 8.5 | − | 208 | 51.0 | + | − | |
Cefoperazone (6.25) | 2 | 128 | 27.1 | − | 471 | 115.4 | + | − |
10 | 58 | 12.3 | − | 443 | 108.6 | + | − | |
25 | 45 | 9.5 | − | 489 | 119.9 | + | − | |
Aztreonam (6.25) | 3 | 241 | 51.1 | + | 495 | 121.3 | + | + |
10 | 57 | 12.1 | − | 517 | 126.7 | + | − | |
50 | 52 | 11.0 | − | 560 | 137.3 | + | − | |
Imipenem-cilastatin (1.56) | 3 | 35 | 7.4 | − | 408 | 100.0 | + | − |
10 | 27 | 5.7 | − | 280 | 68.6 | + | − | |
50 | 25 | 5.3 | − | 289 | 70.8 | + | − | |
Ceftazidime (1.56) | 3 | 54 | 11.4 | − | 578 | 141.7 | + | − |
10 | 66 | 14.0 | − | 568 | 139.2 | + | − | |
100 | 21 | 4.4 | − | 566 | 138.7 | + | − | |
Cefsulodin (1.56) | 5 | 80 | 16.9 | − | 274 | 67.2 | + | − |
15 | 91 | 19.3 | − | 317 | 77.7 | + | − | |
40 | 75 | 15.9 | − | 402 | 98.5 | + | − | |
Cefazolin (≥100) | 3 | 358 | 75.8 | + | 226 | 55.4 | + | + |
15 | 411 | 87.1 | + | 220 | 53.9 | + | + | |
60 | 391 | 82.8 | + | 241 | 59.1 | + | + | |
Controle | 0 | 472 | 100.0 | + | 408 | 100.0 | + | + |
Determined by the standard agar dilution method.
Calculated as (bioluminescence in broth with antimicrobial agent/bioluminescence in broth without antimicrobial agent) × 100.
−, ATP index ≤ 40; +, ATP index > 40.
−, no growth; +, growth.
Results for drug-free conditions are shown.