Campbell 1987.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel trial of fenfluramine versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: "children who had a known cause of autism" Location/setting: children's psychiatric inpatient service, USA Sample size: 11 (6 fenfluramine, 5 placebo) Number of withdrawals/dropouts: none reported Gender: 9 male, 2 female Mean age: 4.48 (1.16) years IQ: "adaptive developmental quotients ranged from 34‐83” Baseline ABC‐I scores or other BoC: not reported/ applicable Concomitant medications: 0% History of previous medications: not reported |
|
Interventions | Intervention (fenfluramine) for 8 weeks: fenfluramine was started at 1.0 mg/kg/day in 2 daily doses. The maximum dose would not exceed 60 mg/day Comparator (placebo) for 8 weeks: "for placebo, the optimal doses ranged from 1.8‐3.3 mg/kg/day (mean = 2.2); the maximum explored dose was 3.3 mg/kg/day.’ |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: AEs Secondary outcomes: none reported Timing of outcome assessment: baseline, week 4, week 8 |
|
Notes | Study start date: not reported Study end date: not reported Funding source: supported, in part, by USPHS grant MH‐32212 from the National Institute of Mental Health Conflicts of interest: none reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Low attrition |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Only selected items from the CGI and CPRS were reported. "None of the items on the CPRS nor their sum produced a statistically significant interaction. The effects of fenfluramine were thus indistinguishable from those of placebo". |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No group differences published |