DeVane 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 10‐week trial of aripiprazole versus risperidone | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Location/setting: 3 academic medical centres and a single private paediatric practice in the USA Mean age: range 6‐15.1 years in aripiprazole group; 6.3‐17.5 years in risperidone group IQ: details not provided Gender: 19% and 23% of aripiprazole and risperidone groups were female. Current or previous medications: aripiprazole, 4/31 had previously taken the study drug (but not within the last 3 years), risperidone, 1/31 had previously taken the study drug (but not within the last 3 years). Baseline ABC‐Irritability scores: > 18 at baseline Sample size: 61 (31 aripiprazole; 30 risperidone) Number analysed: aripiprazole 31, risperidone 30 Reason for dropouts: aripiprazole, 4 discontinued all due to AEs, risperidone, 6 discontinued (3 due to missed visits, 2 AEs, and 1 withdrew on physician's advice) Timing of outcome assessments: "safety, physical, and psychological assessment were recorded at clinic visits that took place weekly or every 2 weeks". |
|
Interventions | Intervention (risperidone): "children weighing 20‐45 kg will receive an initial dose of 0.5 mg daily that will be increased to twice daily on day 4 (morning and bedtime). The dosage will be gradually increased in 0.5 mg increments to a maximum dose of 2.5 mg per day (1.0 mg in the morning and 1.5 mg at bedtime) by the fourth treatment week. A slightly accelerated dosage will be allowed for children who weigh more than 45 kg for a maximum dosage of 3.5 mg /day" Comparator (aripiprazole): starting dosage of 2.0 mg/day. "The dosage will be allowed to increase to 5.0 mg/day on day 4 and can be increased thereafter to a maximum dosage of 15 mg/day. The dosage will only be increased in 5.0 mg intervals. No dosage adjustments will be allowed for either drug after 4 weeks". |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: ABC‐Irritability (Aman 1985); AEs Secondary outcomes: tolerability |
|
Notes | Study start date: September 2011 Study end date: June 2015 Funding: "The study was funded by Grant No. R01HD62550 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health". Conflicts of interest: "The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article". Trial registry: NCT01333072 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given on how random sequence was generated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given on allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All research personnel blinded except for RA who prepared meds and study pharmacist who checked meds |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Physicians (who conducted physical neurological evaluation) and caregiver (who completed questionnaires) were blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were accounted for and included in the analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Protocol available at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01333072 Primary outcome was "Changes in the Irritability Subscale of the Larger ABC (Abberent Behavior Checklist) That Occur From Baseline to 10 Weeks" but they've tested for P values at each week as there was no statistically significant difference at 10 weeks. This is reported misleadingly in the abstract Quote: "Improvement was greatest in the risperidone group at every assessment period" |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |