Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 9;2023(10):CD011769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011769.pub2

Hagerman 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods 6‐month trial of sertraline versus placebo
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • documentation of ASD as verified using both DSM‐5 and ADOS‐2 criteria

  • age between 24 and 72 months

  • stable medications (including antiepileptics, antipsychotics, and clonidine) in the 2 months prior to enrolment

  • concurrent enrolment in at least 1 community or school intervention for ASD


Exclusion criteria:
  • changes in concomitant medications and interventions were discouraged unless medically necessary during the trial

  • current or past SSRI treatment

  • diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome full mutation, or any other serious co‐morbid medical disorders affecting brain function and behaviour, including uncontrolled seizures


Location/setting: USA
Sample size: 58 (32 sertraline, 26 placebo)
Number of withdrawals/dropouts: sertraline (8, 2 lost to follow‐up, 6 withdrew consent); placebo (5, 1 lost to follow‐up, 4 withdrew consent)
Gender: details not provided
Average age (SD) : 4.3 (0.8) and 3.7 (1.1) years in the sertraline and placebo groups
IQ range: details not provided
Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: N/A
Concurrent medications: sertraline (9.38%); placebo (7.69%)
History of previous medications: details not provided
Interventions Intervention: the study drug was administered orally in liquid form (20 mg/mL), and dose was assigned based on age at enrolment: participants under 4 years received sertraline or placebo liquid in a dose of 2.5 mg/day (0.125 mL) for the duration of the trial, and participants ≥ 4 years received 5.0 mg/day (0.25 mL).
Comparator: placebo was administered orally in liquid form for 6 months.
Outcomes Primary outcomes: AEs
Secondary outcomes: tolerability
Notes Study start date: April 2015
Study end date: July 2018
Funding: "This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number R40MCH 27701".
Conflicts of interest: "RH has carried out treatment studies in fragile X syndrome and autism spectrum disorder by Roche, Novartis, Neuren, Marinus, Alcobra, and Curemark and has also consulted with Zynerba and Fulcrum. FT received funds from Asuragen, Roche, and Zynerba. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest".
Trial registry: NCT02385799
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "The UC Davis Investigational Drug Services independently carried out randomization". No information on sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "The UC Davis Investigational Drug Services independently carried out randomization"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Apart from "double‐blinded" no further details were provided.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Apart from "double‐blinded" no further details were provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Dropout < 20% and reasons reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Same primary outcomes as trial reg (MSEL expressive language raw score and age equivalent combined score)
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified