Hagerman 2018.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 6‐month trial of sertraline versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Location/setting: USA Sample size: 58 (32 sertraline, 26 placebo) Number of withdrawals/dropouts: sertraline (8, 2 lost to follow‐up, 6 withdrew consent); placebo (5, 1 lost to follow‐up, 4 withdrew consent) Gender: details not provided Average age (SD) : 4.3 (0.8) and 3.7 (1.1) years in the sertraline and placebo groups IQ range: details not provided Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: N/A Concurrent medications: sertraline (9.38%); placebo (7.69%) History of previous medications: details not provided |
|
Interventions | Intervention: the study drug was administered orally in liquid form (20 mg/mL), and dose was assigned based on age at enrolment: participants under 4 years received sertraline or placebo liquid in a dose of 2.5 mg/day (0.125 mL) for the duration of the trial, and participants ≥ 4 years received 5.0 mg/day (0.25 mL). Comparator: placebo was administered orally in liquid form for 6 months. |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: AEs Secondary outcomes: tolerability |
|
Notes | Study start date: April 2015 Study end date: July 2018 Funding: "This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number R40MCH 27701". Conflicts of interest: "RH has carried out treatment studies in fragile X syndrome and autism spectrum disorder by Roche, Novartis, Neuren, Marinus, Alcobra, and Curemark and has also consulted with Zynerba and Fulcrum. FT received funds from Asuragen, Roche, and Zynerba. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest". Trial registry: NCT02385799 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "The UC Davis Investigational Drug Services independently carried out randomization". No information on sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The UC Davis Investigational Drug Services independently carried out randomization" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Apart from "double‐blinded" no further details were provided. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Apart from "double‐blinded" no further details were provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dropout < 20% and reasons reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Same primary outcomes as trial reg (MSEL expressive language raw score and age equivalent combined score) |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified |