Hellings 2005.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel trial of valproate versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Location/setting: recruitment was through University of Kansas MR/Autism outpatient, USA Sample size: 30 in total (16 to valproate, 14 to placebo) Number of withdrawals/dropouts: 13/16 valproate participants completed the trial, 12/14 in placebo group completed the trial. 1 severely hyperactive and 1 spreading skin rash dropped out on advice from principal investigator and unblinded child psychiatrist, remaining 3 dropped out due to "manifested dangerous aggression". Gender: 20 boys, 10 girls Mean age: 11.2 years Mean IQ: 54 Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: ABC‐I valproate 23.33, placebo 21.93; aggression valproate 10.05, placebo 10.50. Concomitant medications: psychotropic or anticonvulsant medications were not allowed to be taken concurrently. History of previous medications: details not provided |
|
Interventions | Intervention (valproate acid 20 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks: after an initial 1‐week placebo lead‐in phase, valproate liquid (250 mg/5 mL) was gradually introduced with an additional 250 mg added every 3rd day, replacing the equivalent amount of placebo liquid, to achieve a dosage of 20 mg/kg/day. Comparator (placebo) for 8 weeks: placebo administered in a liquid form resembling valproate for 8 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes: tolerability Timing of outcome assessments: weekly |
|
Notes | Study start date: 1998 Study end date: 2003 Source of funding: "funding sources for this work were the National Institute of Mental Health (1K08MH01561‐01), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD26927, HD02528), and Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Abbott Park, Illinois (Unrestricted $5,000 grant)." Conflicts of interest: none declared Trial registry: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "an 8‐week trial of two parallel groups of subjects, randomised to liquid VPA or placebo by the study pharmacist." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The investigators, parents, and teachers were blinded regarding medication or PBO [placebo] status" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "The investigators were blinded regarding medication or PBO [placebo] status" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | An ITT analysis was used however 1 participant is not accounted for LTFU: 1 in valproate group and 1 in placebo group discontinued due to AEs, and 1 in valproate group withdrew due to non‐efficacy |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The ABC‐I was measured and reported at baseline and endpoint. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Potential bias with pharmaceutical company funding but "unrestricted" implies no involvement beyond financial. No significant differences in age, gender, current placement home, day placement school, years in current placement, parental marriage status, and aggression as the worst presenting symptom. |