Hollander 2020b.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 24‐week parallel trial of balovaptan versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Location/setting: 44 sites across the USA Sample size: 134 Number of withdrawals/dropouts: placebo, 26 dropped out (AEs (3); lack of efficacy (1); LTFU (3); physician decision (1); withdrawal by participant (18)). Balovaptan, unclear, groups are not clearly defined. Gender: 83% and 84% were male in the intervention and placebo groups respectively. Mean age: approximately 12 years in both groups IQ: not reported Baseline ABC‐I scores or other BoC: not reported Concomitant medications: not reported History of previous medications: not reported |
|
Interventions | Intervention (balovaptan) for 24 weeks: participants received age‐adjusted total daily oral dose approximately equivalent to the adult dose of 10 mg/day of balovaptan (RO5285119). Approximate treatment duration was up to 24 weeks (up to 52 additional weeks for those enroled in the open‐label extension). Comparator: participants received a matching placebo orally. Approximate treatment duration was up to 24 weeks. |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: none reported Secondary outcomes: QoL (change from baseline) measured using the PedsQL (Varni 2001). Higher scores suggest a higher QoL Timing of outcome assessments: baseline, weeks 12 and 24 (endpoint) |
|
Notes | Study start date: 2016 Study end date: 2020 Source of funding: F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd (pharmaceutical company) Conflicts of interest: various grants and other support from pharmaceutical companies |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided apart from "randomised study" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not provided apart from "Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not provided apart from "Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Difficult to understand participant flow |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The paper/presentation mentions the ABC‐Irritability however, it wasn't reported and was not listed on the trial registry. Also, the study was "Terminated (The 24‐week analysis indicated no clinical or statistical benefit for the primary endpoint for the overall study population. No new safety concerns identified.)" |
Other bias | High risk | List of disclosures included payment by pharma company, for many of the study authors |