Klaiman 2013.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel trial of tetrahydrobiopterin versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Location/setting: Children’s Health Council in Palo Alto, California, USA Sample size: 46 (23 in both groups) Number of withdrawals/dropouts: tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) AEs (2) and lack of efficacy (1), placebo lack of efficacy (1) Gender: tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) 20 male, 3 female, 18 male, 5 female Mean age: 5 years IQ: not reported Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: ABC‐I BH4 11.1, placebo 11.9 Concomitant medications: participants could not have been taking psychotropic drugs in 6 months prior to trial and not start any new medications during the trial. History of previous medications: not reported |
|
Interventions | Intervention (tetrahydrobiopterin) for 16 weeks: "individual doses of BH4 were prescribed in tablet form at 20mg/kg of body weight and taken once daily. The form of BH4 prescribed was given as tetrahydrobiopterin dihydrochloride. "The mean dose of BH4 at endpoint was 385mg/day or 19mg/kg/day" Comparator (placebo) for 16 weeks: matching placebo |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes: tolerability Timing of outcome assessments: baseline, week 8 and week 16 (endpoint) |
|
Notes | Study start date: not reported Study end date: not reported Source of funding: "study drugs and matching placebo were provided by BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc" Conflicts of interest: none declared Trial registry: NCT00850070 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Group assignment was generated by a randomization program on Microsoft Excel" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | One member of the research team (LH) was responsible for all randomisation; randomisation records were kept on a password‐protected computer in a locked office. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | BH4 and placebo were supplied by the pharmacist as matching pills in identical packaging. "Participants, parents, and evaluators (GRE and CK) responsible for assessing the children all were blind to assignment; they remained blind until the final participant completed the trial." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Participants, parents, and evaluators (GRE and CK) responsible for assessing the children all were blind to assignment; they remained blind until the final participant completed the trial." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were included in the analysis and an ITT analysis was used, including using LOCF. All outcomes were reported in full. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All measures were reported in full. |
Other bias | High risk | This research was funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. as an investigator‐initiated study (#CHC0901). |