Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 9;2023(10):CD011769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011769.pub2

McDougle 1996.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel trial of fluvoxamine versus placebo
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • ASD diagnosis based on DSM‐III and ICD‐10

  • "moderate" symptoms as defined by global severity of illness on CGI

  • psychotropic drug‐free for at least 6 weeks before the start of the trial


Exclusion criteria:
  • met DSM‐III‐R criteria for schizophrenia or had psychotic symptoms

  • abused illicit substances within the previous 6 months

  • notable medical condition, including seizure disorder

  • women with positive serum pregnancy test results


Location/setting: a neuroscience research centre at the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, and the Adult Pervasive Developmental Disorders Clinic at the same neuroscience research centre, USA
Sample size: fluvoxamine 15; placebo 15
Number of withdrawals/dropouts: none reported
Gender: 27 men, 3 women
Mean age: 30.1 years
IQ: not reported
Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: aggression (Brown Aggression Scale; Brown 1979) fluvoxamine 9.3, placebo 12.3
Concomitant medications: participants were required to be psychotropic drug‐free before the trial
History of previous medications: not reported
Interventions Intervention (fluvoxamine for 12 weeks): started at 50 mg every night. "The dosage could then be increased by 50 mg daily every 3 or 4 days to a maximum dosage of 300 mg/day, as tolerated, if maximal clinical response was not obtained. Thus, the maximum dosage of fluvoxamine was attained within 3 weeks, and patients received this dose for at least 9 weeks." maximum 300 mg/day
Comparator (placebo for 12 weeks): equivalent placebo, "lactose in identical‐looking tablets"
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
  • AEs

  • aggression (measured using the Brown Aggression Scale (Brown 1979))


Secondary outcomes: none reported
Timing of outcome assessments: baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Notes Study start date: September 1990
Study end date: December 1993
Source of funding: "this work was supported by a National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator Award (Dr McDougle), the State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, The Korczak Foundation for Autism and Related Disorders, and grants MOI RR06022‐33, P50 MH30929‐18, HD 0300827, and POI MH25642from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Fluvoxamine and financial support were provided by Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Marietta, Ga".
Conflicts of interest: none declared
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Details not provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Details not provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The prescribing psychiatrist (C.J.M.), the nurse (S.T.N.) who performed the behavioral ratings, the patients, and all family and other members of the patients' treatment teams were unaware of drug assignment"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "The prescribing psychiatrist (C.J.M.), the nurse (S.T.N.) who performed the behavioral ratings, the patients, and all family and other members of the patients' treatment teams were unaware of drug assignment.". Apart from that it was not described how the outcome assessors were blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All participants were accounted for and included in the analysis. 
Quote: "All patients who complete at least two weeks of drug treatment will be included in the analysis. The final rating scores of any patient who terminates the study prematurely will be carried forward to the end of the study."
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes were reported.
Other bias Unclear risk No significant differences were seen in age, sex distribution, Autism Behavior Checklist scores, or full‐scale IQ scores between the 2 groups.