McDougle 1996.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel trial of fluvoxamine versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Location/setting: a neuroscience research centre at the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, and the Adult Pervasive Developmental Disorders Clinic at the same neuroscience research centre, USA Sample size: fluvoxamine 15; placebo 15 Number of withdrawals/dropouts: none reported Gender: 27 men, 3 women Mean age: 30.1 years IQ: not reported Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: aggression (Brown Aggression Scale; Brown 1979) fluvoxamine 9.3, placebo 12.3 Concomitant medications: participants were required to be psychotropic drug‐free before the trial History of previous medications: not reported |
|
Interventions | Intervention (fluvoxamine for 12 weeks): started at 50 mg every night. "The dosage could then be increased by 50 mg daily every 3 or 4 days to a maximum dosage of 300 mg/day, as tolerated, if maximal clinical response was not obtained. Thus, the maximum dosage of fluvoxamine was attained within 3 weeks, and patients received this dose for at least 9 weeks." maximum 300 mg/day Comparator (placebo for 12 weeks): equivalent placebo, "lactose in identical‐looking tablets" |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes: none reported Timing of outcome assessments: baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks |
|
Notes | Study start date: September 1990 Study end date: December 1993 Source of funding: "this work was supported by a National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Young Investigator Award (Dr McDougle), the State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, The Korczak Foundation for Autism and Related Disorders, and grants MOI RR06022‐33, P50 MH30929‐18, HD 0300827, and POI MH25642from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Fluvoxamine and financial support were provided by Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Marietta, Ga". Conflicts of interest: none declared |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The prescribing psychiatrist (C.J.M.), the nurse (S.T.N.) who performed the behavioral ratings, the patients, and all family and other members of the patients' treatment teams were unaware of drug assignment" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "The prescribing psychiatrist (C.J.M.), the nurse (S.T.N.) who performed the behavioral ratings, the patients, and all family and other members of the patients' treatment teams were unaware of drug assignment.". Apart from that it was not described how the outcome assessors were blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were accounted for and included in the analysis. Quote: "All patients who complete at least two weeks of drug treatment will be included in the analysis. The final rating scores of any patient who terminates the study prematurely will be carried forward to the end of the study." |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No significant differences were seen in age, sex distribution, Autism Behavior Checklist scores, or full‐scale IQ scores between the 2 groups. |