Scahill 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 8‐week parallel trial of guanfacine versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Setting/ location: University of California (Los Angeles), Emory University, Massachusets General Hospital, University of Washington at Seattle, and Yale University, USA Sample size: guanfacine 30; placebo 32 Number of withdrawals/dropouts: 4 from guanfacine group (2 lack of efficacy, 2 AEs); 4 from placebo group all due to lack of efficacy Gender: 26/30 male in guanfacine group; 27/32 male in placebo group Mean age: 8.4 years IQ: not reported Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: guanfacine ABC‐I 20.3; placebo 18.06 Concomitant medication: not reported Previous medications: not reported |
|
Interventions | Intervention (guanfacine) for 8 weeks: starting dose for all children was 1 mg/day. Children < 25kg remained on 1 mg/day until day 14 and then increased to 2 mg/day until day 28, and increased again to 3 mg/day for the remaining 4 weeks. Children 25 kg or more increased to 2 mg/day at day 7 up to a maximum of 4 mg/day by day 21 or 28 of the trial. Comparator (placebo) for 8 weeks: placebo administered for up to 8 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes: none reported Timing of outcome assessment: weekly for the first 4 weeks, then week 6 and week 8 |
|
Notes | Study start date: December 2011 Study end date: March 2014 Source of funding: "supported by NIMH grants to Dr. Scahill (R01MH083707), Dr. McDougle (RO1MH83739), Dr.McCracken (RO1MH083747), and Dr. King (R01MH86927); by a Yale Clinical and Transitional Science Award (UL1 RR024139) from the NIH National Center for Research Resources; and by Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Emory University, which is supported by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award UL1TR000454. Shire Pharmaceuticals provided active extended‐release guanfacine and placebo." Conflicts of interest: none declared Trial registry: NCT01238575 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Using permeated blocks to conceal allocation, eligible subjects were randomly assigned within site without stratification in a 1:1 ratio to extended‐release guanfacine or placebo for 8 weeks." |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Two blinded clinicians followed each subject: a treating clinician and an independent evaluator....To protect the blind, the independent evaluator did not discuss adverse effects or dosing". |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The treatment mask was broken for subjects who did not show a positive response. The blind was broken by the treating clinician, and treatment status was not disclosed to independant evaluators" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Consort diagram was provided outlining numbers at each stage of the trial, including the number analysed and number that completed the trial. All randomly assigned participants were included in the ITT analyses. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Although the ABC‐hyperactivity was the primary outcome measure, other secondary measures such as the CGI were not reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Shire pharmaceuticals provided active extended‐release guanfacine and placebo. |