Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 9;2023(10):CD011769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011769.pub2

Takamitsu 2015a.

Study characteristics
Methods 6‐week cross‐over trial of oxytocin versus placebo
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • diagnosis of ASD

  • male

  • full‐scale IQ (480)

  • aged 18–55 years


Exclusion criteria:
  • any history of allergic responses to oxytocin, seizures, traumatic brain injury with any known cognitive consequences, loss of consciousness for more than 5 min, and substance abuse or addiction.

  • current instability of comorbid psychiatric symptoms and contraindications on MRI scanning


Location/setting: outpatient clinic of The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan
Sample size: oxytocin‐placebo (10), placebo‐oxytocin (10)
Number of withdrawals/dropouts: oxytocin‐placebo (1), placebo‐oxytocin (1) ‐ both due to self‐termination
Gender: all participants were male
Mean age: oxytocin‐placebo = 35.1, placebo‐oxytocin = 29.3
IQ: details not provided
Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: oxytocin‐placebo QoL 3.25 (0.65); placebo‐oxytocin 2.68 (0.82)
Concomitant medications: details not provided
History of previous medications: "moreover, a comparable effect size was also seen in psychotropic‐free participants after excluding one participant with continual medication of serotonin‐norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for his recurrent major depression (d = 0.74)."
Interventions Intervention (oxytocin) for 6 weeks: the participants received oxytocin (24 IU, Syntocinon‐Spray; Novartis) in the morning and afternoon over 6 consecutive weeks (i.e. 48 IU/day).
Comparator (placebo) for 6 weeks: in the same way (24 IU placebo Syntocinon‐Spray; Novartis) in the morning and afternoon over 6 consecutive weeks (i.e. 48 IU/day).
Outcomes Primary outcomes: none reported
Secondary outcomes: QoL (WHO‐QoL) (WHO 1998)
Notes Study start date: March 2012
Study end date: April 2013
Funding: "A part of this study is a result of the ‘Development of biomarker candidates for social behaviour’ project under the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences by the MEXT (K.K. and H.Y.) and the Centre of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (HY)".
Conflicts of interest: "The authors declare no conflict of interests".
Trial registry: UMIN000007122
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomised order
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "The manager completely covered the bottle labels to keep drug types unknown to all participants, their families, experimenters, clinicians and assessors including ADOS administrators and assessors"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Details not provided
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Details not provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All participants were accounted for and included in the analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Primary outcome measures reported per trial reg ‐ https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/detail?trial_id=UMIN000007122
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias identified