Takamitsu 2015a.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 6‐week cross‐over trial of oxytocin versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Location/setting: outpatient clinic of The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan Sample size: oxytocin‐placebo (10), placebo‐oxytocin (10) Number of withdrawals/dropouts: oxytocin‐placebo (1), placebo‐oxytocin (1) ‐ both due to self‐termination Gender: all participants were male Mean age: oxytocin‐placebo = 35.1, placebo‐oxytocin = 29.3 IQ: details not provided Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: oxytocin‐placebo QoL 3.25 (0.65); placebo‐oxytocin 2.68 (0.82) Concomitant medications: details not provided History of previous medications: "moreover, a comparable effect size was also seen in psychotropic‐free participants after excluding one participant with continual medication of serotonin‐norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for his recurrent major depression (d = 0.74)." |
|
Interventions | Intervention (oxytocin) for 6 weeks: the participants received oxytocin (24 IU, Syntocinon‐Spray; Novartis) in the morning and afternoon over 6 consecutive weeks (i.e. 48 IU/day). Comparator (placebo) for 6 weeks: in the same way (24 IU placebo Syntocinon‐Spray; Novartis) in the morning and afternoon over 6 consecutive weeks (i.e. 48 IU/day). |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: none reported Secondary outcomes: QoL (WHO‐QoL) (WHO 1998) |
|
Notes | Study start date: March 2012 Study end date: April 2013 Funding: "A part of this study is a result of the ‘Development of biomarker candidates for social behaviour’ project under the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences by the MEXT (K.K. and H.Y.) and the Centre of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (HY)". Conflicts of interest: "The authors declare no conflict of interests". Trial registry: UMIN000007122 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomised order |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "The manager completely covered the bottle labels to keep drug types unknown to all participants, their families, experimenters, clinicians and assessors including ADOS administrators and assessors" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Details not provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Details not provided |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were accounted for and included in the analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcome measures reported per trial reg ‐ https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/detail?trial_id=UMIN000007122 |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified |