Troost 2005.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel discontinuation trial of risperidone versus placebo | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: on effective psychotropic drug treatment for disruptive behaviour Location/setting: "study participants were recruited from Groningen and Utrecht University Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Centres", the Netherlands Sample size: 24 Number of withdrawals/dropouts: Gender: 22/24 were male Mean age: risperidone 9 years; placebo 8 years IQ: mental age of ≥ 18 months Baseline ABC‐I or other BoC: ABC‐I risperidone 11.1, placebo 12.7 Concomitant medications: provided that no changes in dose during the study would occur. Anticonvulsants used for the treatment of a seizure disorder were permitted if the dose had been stable for at least 4 weeks and the patient was seizure‐free for at least 6 months. 20/24 were not taking any medications concurrently. 3 were on stimulants and 1 was on stimulants and anticonvulsants. History of previous medications: 19/24 had not received any prior psychotropic drugs, 3 had been on stimulants, 1 on antipsychotics and 1 on a stimulant and anticonvulsant. |
|
Interventions | Intervention (risperidone) for 8 weeks: risperidone mean daily dose of 1.8 mg/day or maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg (children weighing < 45 kg) or 3.5 mg (children ≥ 45 kg) Comparator (placebo) for 8 weeks: "for the placebo group, entry doses were reduce by 25% per week for 3 consecutive weeks. After full placebo substitution, the placebo group remained on placebo for 8 weeks." |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes: none reported Timing of outcome assessments: weekly during the discontinuation phase |
|
Notes | Study start date: details not reported Study end date: details not reported Source of funding: "Korczak Foundation" ‐ EBMH publication Conflicts of interest: "Dr. Buitelaar is a paid consultant to or has received support from Janssen Cilag BV, Abbott, VCB, Shire, Medice, and Eli Lilly; Dr. Minderaa is a paid consultant to Eli Lilly and Janssen Cilag BV; and Dr. Scahill is a paid consultant to Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Bristol‐Myers Squibb, and Pfizer."Study medications were donated by Janssen Cilag BV." Trial registry: not reported. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The randomisation sequence was generated by an outside vendor and was stratified by investigational site. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Risperidone and placebo were supplied by the pharmacist at each site as matching capsules in identical packages. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, parents and evaluators all were unaware of assignment to placebo or risperidone. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patients, parents and evaluators all were unaware of assignment to placebo or risperidone. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Sedation was not reported as an AE. No LTFU reported by the study authors. ITT analysis: an ITT analysis was used for all participants enroled by using the LOCF for all measures. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The ABC‐I scores were reported in full for both the open‐label and discontinuation phases of the trial. However, the CGI scores were only reported at baseline. |
Other bias | High risk | Dr. Buitelaar is a paid consultant to or has received support from Janssen Cilag BV, Abbott, VCB, Shire, Medice, and Eli Lilly; Dr. Minderaa is a paid consultant to Eli Lilly and Janssen Cilag BV; and Dr. Scahill is a paid consultant to Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Bristol‐Myers Squibb, and Pfizer. Only 8/24 with autism were in discontinuation phase despite title mentioning ASD. Baseline ABC‐I was relatively low. |